Comparison of Skin Closure Techniques in Oncological Neurosurgical Procedures: Intradermal Running Suture Versus Transdermal Interrupted Sutures
NCT07413796 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 382
Last updated 2026-05-20
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two commonly used methods of closing the skin after surgery for an intracranial tumor. Skin closure is one of the most important steps in neurosurgical procedures, as it has a major influence on how well the wound heals. In patients with brain tumors, proper wound healing is especially important because it may affect how soon additional treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, can be started.
There are different ways to close the skin after surgery, including running sutures and interrupted sutures. Both methods are widely used and considered safe. However, in oncological neurosurgery, there is limited scientific evidence comparing their effects, and the choice of technique is often based on the surgeon's personal experience. In this study, investigators will compare skin closure using running absorbable sutures with interrupted non-absorbable sutures. Investigators will evaluate how well, depending on used suturing methods, the wound heals and how often wound-related complications occur, such as infection, separation of the wound edges, or leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. Investigators believe that the results of this study will help improve wound care in patients undergoing neurosurgical treatment for brain tumors and, as a result, may contribute to better recovery and overall quality of life.
Conditions
- Brain Tumor Adult
- Brain Tumor Benign
- Meningioma
- Glioma
- Glioblastoma
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Absorbable running intradermal suture
Absorbable sutures used to perform continuous/running intradermal skin closure.
- OTHER
-
Non-absorbable interrupted transdermal suture
Non-absorbable sutures used to perform interrupted transdermal skin closure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical University of Warsaw
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Michał Senger, M.D. · Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
-
Tomasz A Dziedzic, M.D. Phd · Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-02-29
- Completion
- 2028-05-31
Countries
- Poland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Secondary Versus Tertiary Wound Closure in High Risk Gynecologic Abdominal Surgical Incisions
NCT03861065 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Set-back Suture Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress Suture
NCT01773447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Clinical Trial of Skin Closure With Staples Versus Suture
NCT01977612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
PMCF-study Using Novosyn® Quick Suture Material for Skin Closure
NCT02680886 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Suture Closure Trial
NCT05261425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance
NCT01352533 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Sutures vs Staples for High Tension Closures
NCT06638736 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Wall Closure With Triclosan-coated Suture
NCT01620294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcuticular Skin Closure Versus Steri-strip S Closure
NCT00727025 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate Together With a Self-adhering Mesh
NCT01658163 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Purse-String Closure Vs Second Intention
NCT02062866 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short Stitch Monomax®
NCT01938222 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Running Locking Suture vs Standard Running Suture in Surgical Wounds
NCT06288009 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of PrineoTM (Dermabond Protape) Skin Adhesive for Wound Closure Following Abdominoplasty
NCT01544556 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intracutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Sutures in the Face (IC vs TC Sutures)
NCT02125058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimization of the Nursing Time After the Use of Tissue Adhesives During the Chest Port Placement on Patients Treated With Chemotherapy Versus Sutures
NCT04848389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Wall Closure With Triclosan-coated Suture (TCS09-10)
NCT01123616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Postoperative Pain and Skin Closure Methods After Cesarean Section
NCT02028000 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
MonoMax for Abdominal Wall Closure
NCT01901068 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Skin Closures at Cesarean Delivery, Glue vs Subcuticular Sutures.
NCT04371549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Closed Incision Disposable Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
NCT04808765 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The QUILT Study: Quilting Sutures in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT05272904 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Cuticular Suture Distance (2mm vs 5mm)
NCT04870008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Wound Closure Using V-Loc™ 90 Sutures in Lipoabdominoplasty Patients
NCT01574378 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4