CABG Versus PCI in Patients With Isolated LAD Chronic Total Occlusion

NCT07373678 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 302

Last updated 2026-01-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of isolated chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery in terms of short- and mid-term clinical outcomes, myocardial revascularization success, and complication rates.

Conditions

  • Chronic Total Occlusion

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed as part of routine clinical care prior to study inclusion.

PROCEDURE

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention performed as part of routine clinical care prior to study inclusion.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Biruni University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Mersin Training and Research Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Necmettin Erbakan University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Jolimont Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Minneapolis Heart Institute

    collaborator OTHER
  • Mersin Medicalpark Hastanesi

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sefa SURAL, MD · Toros University

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-09-10
Primary Completion
2025-12-31
Completion
2026-01-15

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07373678 on ClinicalTrials.gov