Total Arterial vs. Mixed Grafting in Left Coronary CABG
NCT07057713 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 400
Last updated 2026-04-23
Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of total arterial grafting (internal thoracic artery and radial artery) versus conventional mixed grafting (internal thoracic artery and great saphenous vein) in the left coronary artery system during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 400 patients undergoing elective CABG at the Second Hospital of Jilin University will be enrolled and randomized into two groups. The primary endpoint is graft patency at 12 months postoperatively, evaluated by coronary angiography or CT angiography. Secondary outcomes include perioperative complications, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and long-term clinical prognosis. The study aims to provide evidence-based guidance on optimal graft selection in CABG.
Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- Arterial Graft
- Graft Patency
- Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Total Arterial Grafting
Coronary artery bypass grafting using only arterial conduits in the left coronary artery system. The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) is grafted to the LAD, and the radial artery is anastomosed to the obtuse marginal or diagonal branches. This approach avoids the use of saphenous vein grafts for the left coronary system.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Mixed Grafting
A standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure where the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) is grafted to the LAD, and saphenous vein grafts are used for the obtuse marginal or diagonal branches of the left coronary system. This approach represents the conventional mixed arterial-venous strategy.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Second Hospital of Jilin University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kexiang Liu · Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-08-01
- Completion
- 2027-12-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
CABG Combined Pedicled Omentum Wrapped Autologous Atrial Tissue Patch Cardiomyoplasty for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00972114 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Coronary Bypass Grafting With or Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT00216957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein
NCT06014047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid Revascularization Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
NCT05504031 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Saphenous Vein as Y-composite Versus Aortocoronary Conduit for CABG
NCT05704296 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Proximal Versus Distal Segments of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts
NCT04284956 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Post-operation Cardiopulmonary Capacity of Patients Underwent Conventional and Robot-assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Valve Replacement Surgery
NCT05430568 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Study
NCT00000463 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Multidisciplinary CAE and CABG Surgery to Optimize the Management of High-risk Patients During the Perioperative Period
NCT04960488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotically-assisted Minimally-invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass With Stenting, Randomized Against Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
NCT06378775 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Concomitant Bypass Surgery in Septal Myectomy
NCT06354413 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mini Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass In CABG in Asian Patients
NCT03657225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
DACAB Trial: Follow-up Extension
NCT03987373 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Graft Patency of QFR-guided Versus Angio-guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
NCT03770520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients With Multi Vessel Coronary Disease
NCT06794359 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Cohort Study on Minimal Invasive Coronary Surgery
NCT04267835 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Early Outcome of Total Arterial Revasclarization in IHD
NCT03577821 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Factors Related to Late Events and Saphenous Graft Patency
NCT00755248 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study Of Factors Favoring The Onset Of Novo Atrial Fibrillation In The Immediate Aftermath Of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT02042547 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Myocardial Hybrid Revascularization Versus Coronary artERy Bypass GraftING for Complex Triple-vessel Disease
NCT02226900 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MInithoraCotomy vs Sternotomy for Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial Assessing Quality of Life and Patency Outcomes
NCT04795193 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of One-stop Hybrid Revascularization Versus Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass for the Treatment of Multi-vessel Disease
NCT01034371 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Effectiveness of No-touch Technique for Ascending Aorta in MICS-CABG
NCT07172620 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery Compared to STernotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Trial
NCT03447938 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
NCT06787651 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA