Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Self-Gripping and Conventional Mesh in Laparoscopic Totally Extra Peritoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT07350187 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 95
Last updated 2026-01-20
Summary
This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare clinical outcomes between self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh with limited tacker fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.
Adult patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia and scheduled for laparoscopic TEP repair are randomly assigned to receive either a self-gripping mesh (Progrip™) or a conventional mesh fixed with a single permanent tacker to the pubic bone (Parietex™). Both meshes are commonly used in clinical practice and approved for inguinal hernia repair.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate postoperative discomfort and quality of life following surgery. Outcomes are assessed using validated patient-reported questionnaires, including the Carolina Comfort Scale (CCS) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, physical examination findings such as local induration or tenderness, operative time, and short-term hernia recurrence.
Patients are followed at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months after surgery. The results of this study aim to provide comparative evidence regarding the safety and short-term clinical outcomes of self-gripping versus tacker-fixed conventional mesh in laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.
Conditions
- Inguinal Hernias
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Self-gripping mesh (Progrip™)
self-gripping surgical mesh used during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. The mesh adheres to surrounding tissue via resorbable microgrips and does not require additional fixation devices.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional mesh with tacker fixation (Parietex™)
A conventional surgical mesh used during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. The mesh is fixed with a single permanent tacker placed on the pubic bone to ensure mesh stability.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Chungnam National University Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-10-22
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-14
- Completion
- 2025-10-14
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair- Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Totally Extra Peritoneal (TEP)
NCT00687375 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation
NCT02748629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Parietex Progrip Study
NCT00827944 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Trial Comparing Two Different Polypropylene Meshes for Inguinal Hernias
NCT01825187 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self Fixating Mesh to Mesh Fixation With Metallic Tacks in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03564535 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3 Fixation Devices in Laparoscopic Ventral Herniotomy
NCT01534780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Heavyweight and Partially Absorbable Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01877122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bilateral Laparoscopic Repair of Groin Hernias With One Large Self-fixating Mesh (ProGripTM)
NCT02525666 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03856710 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
NCT06240858 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias
NCT00681291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transorb™ Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh in High-risk Subjects Undergoing Open Repair of Ventral Hernia
NCT06449378 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03276871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Fixating Mesh Versus Mesh Fixation With Tissue Glue in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06412445 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02920307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Surgical Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Sutured Repair Versus Tacker Use
NCT05574751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between TAPP and Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Surgery
NCT07067281 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT01592942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?
NCT06070142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the 3DMax™ MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in Laparoscopic-endoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
NCT07289802 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
TEP Versus Open Minimal Suture Repair for the Sportsman's Groin
NCT02297711 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Outcome After Lichtenstein Operation vs. ProGrip Patch Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT01026935 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Macroporous Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT02023203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA