Safety and Efficacy of the 3DMax™ MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in Laparoscopic-endoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
NCT07289802 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 300
Last updated 2025-12-17
Summary
This is a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the 3DMax MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Adult patients undergoing elective transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair will be enrolled and followed according to routine clinical practice.
The primary objective is to assess the inguinal hernia recurrence rate within 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives include evaluation of postoperative pain, groin discomfort and foreign body sensation, as well as early and late postoperative complications.
All participating patients will receive the 3DMax MID Anatomical Mesh as part of standard care. No additional experimental procedures are planned. Clinical data will be collected at baseline and during predefined follow-up contacts (early postoperative period, 1 month, 3 months and 12 months) using standardized forms and patient interviews.
Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
3DMax MID Anatomical Mesh
Implantation of a pre-shaped, medium-weight, macroporous polypropylene anatomical mesh (3DMax MID Anatomical Mesh, BD, USA) during elective laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP or TEP) as part of routine clinical practice. No additional experimental procedures beyond standard surgical care are planned.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Swissmed Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Maciej Śmietański, Prof. · LUX MED Hospital in Gdańsk
-
Mateusz Zamkowski, MD, PhD · LUX MED Hospital in Gdańsk
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-01
- Completion
- 2027-04-01
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair by a 3D ENDOLAP Visible Mesh With or Without LiquiBand Fix 8 Mesh Fixation
NCT02781870 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D vs 2D HD Laparoscopy in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02367573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?
NCT06070142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Open Preperitoneal Surgery With Polysoft Mesh Versus a Classic Open Surgery With Light Weight Mesh
NCT00323674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02396940 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does a Transabdominal Plane Block Decrease Patient Pain After Ventral Hernia Repair?
NCT02007096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Mesh and Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery
NCT03755219 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Implantation for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT01203553 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
MEsh FIxation in Laparoendoscopic Repair of Large M3 Inguinal Hernias
NCT05678465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Does the Choice of Self-fixated Mesh Matter?
NCT05091853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preperitoneal Versus Pre-trasversalis Hernia Repair
NCT01350830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia?
NCT06070207 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Changing the Innate Consensus About Mesh Fixation in Trans-abdominal Preperitoneal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty in Adults: Short and Long Term Outcome. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT04272424 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Lightweight Meshes in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair on Quality of Life and Male Fertility Aspects
NCT00925067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation inTEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02419950 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Trial of a Bio-absorbable Mesh in Challenging Laparoscopic Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02712398 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Mesh Integration and Mesh Contraction After Open Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Using a Memory Ring Containing Device
NCT01622712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Study of Open Mesh Repair in Local Anesthesia Versus Cost-optimized Laparoscopic Repair for Inguinal Hernia
NCT01020058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral vs Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repairs With an Asymptomatic Inguinal Hernia in Bilateral Hernias
NCT07289490 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03276871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair With Self-fixating Parietex™ ProGrip™ Mesh
NCT01481376 ·Status: COMPLETED