The Buzdar Technique
NCT07338019 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300
Last updated 2026-01-13
Summary
Chest tube thoracostomy remains a lifesaving intervention in trauma and thoracic surgery, used for the management of pneumothorax, hemothorax, empyema, and pleural effusions. Despite being one of the most frequently performed procedures worldwide, complication rates remain high, ranging from 20% to 40% \[1\]. Among these, pulmonary parenchymal chest tube (PPcT) insertion represents a rare but potentially devastating event, leading to hemorrhage, air leak, bronchopleural fistula, or infection. In Pakistan, where chest trauma and pneumothorax constitute major thoracic morbidities, PPcT cases are encountered with increasing frequency but remain underreported. Current literature describes only invasive surgical approaches-such as thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)-for PPcT removal \[9,10\], with no established minimally invasive alternatives.
In response to this clinical challenge, the Department of Thoracic Surgery at (Hospital Name), Punjab, Pakistan, has developed and implemented a novel, minimally invasive three-stage removal technique, termed the Buzdar Technique, designed to ensure safe extraction of intraparenchymal chest tubes without surgical intervention. The technique follows a standardized protocol involving:
Healing phase: Tube left in situ for approximately two weeks to allow localized fibrosis and stabilization of the lung parenchyma.
Initial retraction: Gradual 2-cm withdrawal with optional 360° rotation under radiologic and clinical supervision, followed by 24-hour observation and chest imaging.
Sequential retractions: Weekly staged retractions of 2 cm until the last fenestration exits the pleural cavity, enabling safe final removal.
This prospective cohort study, conducted from July 2025 to June 2026, aims to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and clinical outcomes of the Buzdar Technique in managing iatrogenic PPcT. Data will include patient demographics, procedural details, complications, radiologic recovery, and overall outcomes. Success will be defined as complete tube removal without pneumothorax, air leak, bleeding, or need for surgical intervention.
Preliminary institutional experience over the past decade has shown excellent results, with minimal morbidity, no requirement for thoracotomy or VATS, and full radiologic recovery in the majority of patients. The expected outcomes of this prospective evaluation are to validate these findings, establish the Buzdar Technique as a reproducible, evidence-based approach, and contribute to the global literature on non-surgical management of PPcT.
If proven effective, this technique could represent a paradigm shift in the management of intraparenchymal chest tubes-offering a safe, staged, and minimally invasive alternative to surgical removal, particularly beneficial for centers in low- and middle-income countries where advanced surgical options may not always be available.
Conditions
- Chest Tube Management
- Chest Tube Withdrawal
- Iatrogenic Injury
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Gradual chest tube removal
Stage 1: Healing and Fibrosis Phase (2 Weeks) Once PPcT is identified, the tube is left in situ for approximately 14 days to allow localized fibrosis and sealing of the injured lung parenchyma around the tube. During this period, the patient is kept under clinical observation and radiologic monitoring (serial chest X-rays or CT scan). Antibiotic coverage is continued to prevent secondary infection, and negative pressure drainage (closed chest drainage system) is maintained to ensure pleural space healing. Stage 2: Initial Retraction and Assessment After the initial 14-day period, under sterile conditions, the chest tube is retracted approximately 2 cm. If any resistance is encountered, gentle 360° rotation of the tube is performed to free adhesions. The patient is then observed for 24 hours, during which vital signs, oxygen saturation, and drainage output are monitored. A post-retraction chest X-ray is obtained to evaluate for pneumothorax, air leak, or any evidence of lung compromise
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Health Sciences Lahore
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-09-30
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Negative Pleural Suction for Tube Thoracostomy in Patients With Chest Trauma
NCT01864577 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application Study of 12G Pigtail Catheter Used for Post-operative Drainage After Thoracoscopic Surgery for Mediastinal Nodes
NCT03743389 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy, Safety and Re-occurrence of Pneumothorax and Hydro-pneumothorax With Talc and Pyodine Pleurodesis
NCT04130451 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Risk of Pneumothorax With and Without Chest Tube Clamping in Patients With Pleural Pathology
NCT05243316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Chest Tube Removal After Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06411431 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Management of Traumatic Hemothoraces
NCT03050502 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Feasibility and Safety Study of the Use of a Dedicated Ballooned Intercostal Drain
NCT01869504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Medical Thoracoscopy in Treatment Outcomes of Empyema Management
NCT06132997 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
16F vs 24F Chest Drain After Minimally Invasive Lobectomy and/or Segmentectomy
NCT06958848 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-center:The Small (14F) Percutaneous Catheter vs. Large (28-40F) Open Chest Tube for Traumatic Hemothorax (P-CAT)
NCT03546764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Positive Expiratory Pressure on the Management of Chest Trauma
NCT04548466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fluid Output Threshold for Safe Chest Tube Removal - A Potential Way to Decrease Length of Stay in Hospital and to Improve Postoperative Care After Lung Surgery?
NCT03093610 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Emergency Small vs Large Tube Thoracostomy in Chest Trauma Patients.
NCT04863989 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reactor Thoracostomy
NCT03734471 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Suturing With U-Technique Versus Un-Reapproximated Wound Edges During Removal of Closed Thoracostomy Tube Drain
NCT04193241 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ThOracoscopic Wedge Resection Treated With Chest Tube Removal Intraoperatively
NCT02829736 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of Needle Exsufflation for Pneumothorax
NCT02528734 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluating Improvised Chest Drainage Techniques in Conflict Zones
NCT06683976 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Talc Slurry Versus Talc Insufflation: A Study on Effectiveness, Safety, and Hospital Outcomes in Pleurodesis
NCT07167992 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Outcome of ICT Drainage and VATS in Management of Second Stage Empyema
NCT06680024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thoracostomy Tube Irrigation: a Multi-Center Trial
NCT05935267 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Tubeless VATS for Peripheral Lung Nodule
NCT02817048 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Decortication in Complex Empyema Cases: Multidrug Resistance and Tuberculosis at the Forefront
NCT07167823 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
VATS Decortication Versus IR Guided Chest Tube Insertion With Fibrinolytics for the Management of Empyema
NCT03584113 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficacy of Chest Tube Drainage and Needle Aspiration in Pneumothorax Treatment
NCT03293199 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA