Comparison of Talc Slurry Versus Talc Insufflation: A Study on Effectiveness, Safety, and Hospital Outcomes in Pleurodesis

NCT07167992 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160

Last updated 2026-01-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Pleural effusion is characterized by the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, which typically contains about 10-20 mL of pleural fluid that is crucial for the movement of the lungs against the chest wall. This fluid closely resembles plasma but has a lower protein concentration, usually less than 1.5 gm/dL. It primarily originates from pleural capillaries and the interstitial spaces of the lung, and is reabsorbed through the lymphatic vessels in the parietal pleura, either via small openings known as stomas or through a process called transcytosis (1, 2). When the balance between fluid production and reabsorption is disrupted-often due to various pathogenic mechanisms-it can lead to pleural effusion. In such cases, effective management is essential. This study aims to conduct a thorough comparison of the two talc administration methods-TS and TI-using sterilized, large-particle, asbestos-free talc powder. By examining key outcome measures such as pleurodesis success rates, procedural morbidity, and length of hospital stay, the goal is to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance to facilitate informed decision-making in the management of pleural effusions.

Conditions

  • Pneumothorax Spontaneous Primary
  • Pneumothorax Spontaneous Secondary
  • Pleural Effusion, Malignant
  • Pleurodesis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pleurodesis

Talc slurry pleurodesis is a chemical technique for managing recurrent pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. The procedure involves instilling a suspension of talc (4-5 grams) in sterile saline (50-100 mL) into the pleural space via a chest tube. This induces an inflammatory reaction, leading to fibrosis and fusion of pleural surfaces. The technique demonstrates 70-90% success rates in malignant pleural effusions and pneumothoraces, with efficacy comparable to talc poudrage. While generally safe, potential complications include pain, fever, and rarely, pneumonitis or empyema. Use of large-particle, asbestos-free talc and standardized protocols has improved its safety profile.

PROCEDURE

pleurodesis

Talc insufflation, is a pleurodesis technique involving direct insufflation of dry talc powder into the pleural cavity during thoracoscopy. It allows visual inspection of the pleural space and concurrent diagnostic procedures. Success rates range from 85% to 93% for malignant pleural effusions and pneumothoraces, with efficacy comparable or potentially superior to talc slurry in some studies. The procedure typically requires general anesthesia and is more invasive than talc slurry. Common side effects include chest pain, fever, and dyspnea. The risk of severe respiratory complications has decreased with large-particle, asbestos-free talc. While effective, the choice between insufflation and slurry depends on patient factors, institutional expertise, and resource availability.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Health Sciences Lahore

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Muhammad Shoaib Nabi, Professor of Thoracic Surgery · Services institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS), Services Hospital Lahore

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-02-01
Primary Completion
2027-01-30
Completion
2027-03-30

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07167992 on ClinicalTrials.gov