Comparison of Two Orthodontic Clean-Up Protocols
NCT07304310 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 142
Last updated 2025-12-26
Summary
Orthodontic clean-up following debonding remains a technically demanding procedure, with documented risks of enamel roughening, microdefects, discoloration, and increased plaque retention. Minimally invasive technologies have recently been introduced to improve adhesive removal while limiting damage to the outer enamel layer, but comparative clinical evidence remains limited. This aim of this case-control study was to compare the effectiveness and the safety of two different minimally invasive clean-up systems: two-step ultrasonic inserts (Combi Touch, Mectron) and a one-step polishing bur (One Gloss®, Shofu).
A total of 142 patients presenting residual orthodontic adhesive after debonding were included. They were randomly allocated to: (1) Case group (n = 71): two-step ultrasonic system (Combi Touch, Mectron) equipped with 30-µm diamond-coated and PEEK-coated inserts; (2) Control group (n= 71): one-step tungsten carbide/abrasive polisher (One Gloss®, Shofu). For each patient the following clinical indices were recorded at baseline (T0) and 30-day follow-up (T1): Plaque Control Record (PCR), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI), International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II), and dentinal sensitivity (Schiff Air Index). Orthodontic treatment modality (clear aligners vs fixed appliances) was documented as a covariate and tested for potential interactions with clinical outcomes.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance
- Debonding
- Case-control Study
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Two-step ultrasonic protocol
Diamond- and PEEK-coated inserts
- DEVICE
-
One-step clean-up protocol
One-step tungsten carbide/abrasive polisher
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
IRCCS San Raffaele
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-04-08
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-01
- Completion
- 2025-09-01
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols
NCT06218641 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Sandblasting on the Rebonding Strength
NCT04606043 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Enamel Demineralization During Clear Aligner Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04107012 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Pain Experienced During Orthodontic Treatment and Bracket Removal Depend on the Architecture of the Bracket?
NCT06324162 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
T-Scan Study of Occlusion in Case of Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT03887975 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Effectiveness of Different Esthetic Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06803433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Dentoalveolar Changes of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances on Skeletal Class I Non-extraction Patients With Dental Crowding
NCT07090746 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Efficacy of Resin Infiltration Using Different Conditioning Methods: 24-Month Results
NCT06259214 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Hygiene in Patients With Orthodontic Fixed Appliances
NCT03789812 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Smile Arc Assessment in Orthodontic Patients Following Smile Arc Protection VS MBT Placement Guide Bonding Strategies
NCT05277506 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RMGI v Composite for Orthodontic Bonding
NCT01925924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Difference Between Pressing and Vacuum Techniques in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners in Cases With Spacing: A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06231875 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Teeth Decrowding With and Without Fixed Appliances
NCT06416189 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligner
NCT06410105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Changes in Electromyographic Activity in Aligner Treatment of Adult Patients With and Without Nocturnal Bruxism
NCT06343194 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Dental Waterjet on Oral Hygiene for Patients With Braces
NCT03119441 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Associated With Interproximal Enamel Reduction in Orthodontics: a RCT
NCT02455700 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally-invasive Non-surgical Therapy of Intrabony Defects
NCT03741374 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a "Flash-free" Adhesive Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding
NCT02030002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Occlusal Analysis and Enamel Wear Assessment in Temporomandibular Disorder Patients Treated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Stabilization Splints
NCT06781320 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Distalization by Miniscrew
NCT02427282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1