Aesthetic Efficacy of Resin Infiltration Using Different Conditioning Methods: 24-Month Results

NCT06259214 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-02-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Objective: To assess color and fluorescence changes in white spot lesions (WSLs) using different surface conditioning methods prior to resin infiltration: 24-months follow-up Methods: Thirty patients with each at minimum four WSLs after bracket debonding were included. After baseline fluorescence and color measurements, the lesions were randomly divided into four groups (n = 30): G1 (control): regular brushing, G2: 15% HCl gel (Icon Etch), G3: 37% H3PO4 gel (Scotchbond Etchant), G4: Er:YAG laser (Fotona AT Fidelis III). The lesions were desiccated with Icon Dry and then Icon Infiltrant (DMG) was applied. In the treatment groups, color and fluorescence were examined at baseline (T0), just after the resin infiltration treatment (T1), and after 6 (T2) and 24 months (T3). In the control group, the examinations were performed at baseline (T0) and after 6 (T2) and 24 months (T3).

Conditions

  • White Spot Lesion

Interventions

OTHER

15% HCl gel

Icon , DMG, Hamburg, Germany

OTHER

H3PO4 gel

Scotchbond Etchant, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA

OTHER

Er:YAG laser

Fotona AT Fidelis III, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ondokuz Mayıs University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Max Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-06
Primary Completion
2019-01-06
Completion
2020-04-06

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06259214 on ClinicalTrials.gov