MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Amniotic Membrane Dressing and Aquacel®Ag in Second-degree Burns

NCT07300137 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2026-02-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the outcome of amniotic membrane dressing versus Aquacel® Ag dressing with respect to the duration of healing in patients with second-degree burns within the local demographic setting. This study aims to address the existing gap in the literature by comparing the efficacy of amniotic membrane dressing and Aquacel® Ag dressing in the management of second-degree burns. Although Aquacel® Ag has been extensively studied for partial-thickness burns, it has not been directly compared with human amniotic membrane dressing, and no randomized controlled trial has yet evaluated these two treatment modalities. The findings of this study are expected to provide healthcare providers with an effective and cost-efficient dressing option for burn patients, particularly in resource-limited countries, while minimizing morbidity.

Conditions

  • Second Degree Burns

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL

preserved amniotic membrane dressing

application of preserved human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing for second degree burn wounds

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Patel Hospital, Pakistan

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shazra Khalid, MBBS · Patel Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-09-20
Primary Completion
2026-07-01
Completion
2026-08-01

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07300137 on ClinicalTrials.gov