Mepilex Ag vs. Xeroform in Pediatric Patients That Sustain Partial Thickness Burn Injury
NCT04149808 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2023-01-26
Summary
Pediatric patients that sustain partial thickness burn injuries to their extremities require regular scheduled dressings and weekly appointments for better healing. Typically, the dressing used at Children's Hospital of Michigan is Xeroform, which can often be painful when changing at the weekly clinic appointment. Mepilex Ag is also an approved treatment for these types of burns and has the potential to cause less pain with dressing changes, however is not used as frequently due to a much higher cost. Studies evaluating the treatment of partial thickness burns in pediatric patients have shown decreased cost and length of stay associated with dressings that are silver impregnated, like Mepilex Ag. However, these studies are all retrospective with a possible selection bias to patients. In addition, several studies have suggested less pain with newer foam and hydrofiber dressings. We are conducting a prospective study using patients with partial thickness burns of their extremities, applying Xeroform on half of the burn, and Mepilex Ag on the other half of the burn, to remove confounding variables between patients to determine the optimal burn dressing for partial thickness scald burns for pediatric patients. A partial thickness burn, also known as a second degree burn, extends into the top two layers of the skin, not passing the hypodermis. Our goal is to determine if Xeroform or Mepilex Ag is superior treatment for partial thickness burns in pediatric patients for healing time, appearance of scar, and patient pain and comfort during treatment and dressing changes.
Conditions
- Second-degree Burn
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Mepilex Ag (burn dressing)
Dressing for low to medium exuding burns and wounds.
- DEVICE
-
Xeroform Dressing
Standard of care dressing for low to medium exuding burns and wounds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Wayne State University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Elika Ridelman, PhD · Wayne State University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 7 Years
- Max Age
- 17 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-09-01
- Completion
- 2022-09-01
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerance of Mepilex® Ag Versus Silvadene®
NCT00742183 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Mepitel Ag vs Antibiotic Ointment Used With Soft Cast Technique for Treatment of Pediatric Burns
NCT02681757 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RES® Prepared With RECELL® Compared to Standard of Care Dressings of Partial-thickness Burns in Ages 1-16 Years
NCT03626701 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A PMCF Investigation on Exuding Chronic Wounds Using Exufiber® as Primary Dressing, and Mepilex® Border Flex/Comfort
NCT04960553 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Soft Silicone Wound Contact Layer Containing Silver in the Treatment of Skin Grafts in Surgical Burn Patients.
NCT02210208 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Soft Silicone, Silver Containing, Foam Dressing, Mepilex Border Ag, in Second Degree Burns
NCT01418482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dehydrated Human Amnion Chorion Membrane (dHACM) vs. Control in the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns.
NCT02765737 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
An Open Single-centre Investigation Evaluating Efficacy in Second Degree Partial Thickness Burns Using a Silicone Contact Layer Containing Silver.
NCT01734317 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of AWBAT™-D and MEPILEX® AG for Treatment of Donor Sites in Burn Surgery
NCT00974597 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Permeaderm Versus Homograft for Full-thickness Burns
NCT04673435 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Burn Glove Trial - Hand Burn Dressing Pilot
NCT02318056 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing a Cellulose Dressing to Two Standard of Care Dressings in Treating Split Thickness Donor Sites in Burn and Wound Patients.
NCT05499104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Performance and Safety of Exufiber Ag+ and Exufiber on Partial Thickness Burns
NCT04839523 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Healing With Epidermal Fractional Blistergrafting (CellutomeTM) to Acellular Technique
NCT02982096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Silver Foam Dressing Superior to Porcine Xenograft in Pediatric Scalds
NCT04410497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Comparison of AWBAT™-D vs. Xeroform™ or Glucan II™ for Treatment of Donor Sites in Burn Surgery
NCT00964470 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Amniotic Membrane Dressing and Aquacel®Ag in Second-degree Burns
NCT07300137 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Suprathel Versus Xeroform for the Management of Skin Graft Donor Sites
NCT04014400 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Silver in Partial Thickness Pediatric Burns
NCT06971562 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Aluminaid Versus Hydrogel Wound Dressings
NCT03190655 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-Stage Integra Reconstruction in Burns
NCT03077087 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
An Investigation to Evaluate a New Donor Site Dressing in Surgical Burn Patients
NCT01670201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Different Wound Dressings in Split-skin Grafted Third Degree Burns
NCT03674151 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Exufiber Ag+ and Other Gelling Fibre Dressings
NCT03249909 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Chitosan and Carboxymethylcellulose Silver Dressings on Burn Wounds in Pediatric and Adult Subjects
NCT02353507 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4