PermeaDerm® vs. Mepilex-Ag® in Promoting Healing of Partial-thickness Burn Wounds

NCT03613870 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2023-06-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds: PermeaDerm® (PermeaDerm, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA) and silver impregnated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®, Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden)

Conditions

  • Partial-thickness Burn

Interventions

DEVICE

PermeaDerm

Wound treatment with PermeaDerm

DEVICE

Mepilex Ag

Wound treatment with Mepilex Ag

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ludwik K Branski, MD · The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Months
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-07-19
Primary Completion
2018-12-01
Completion
2019-07-11
FDA Device
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03613870 on ClinicalTrials.gov