Preperitoneal Versus Pre-trasversalis Hernia Repair
NCT01350830 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 253
Last updated 2011-05-10
Summary
Chronic pain rate is from 0 to 50% after prosthetic groin hernia repair. We compared two anterior technique positioning the mesh in the pre-trasversalis space vs preperitoneal space to assess any differences in term of chronic pain and early and late complications
Conditions
- Direct Inguinal Hernia
- Indirect Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
anterior hernia repair
Inguinal incision is made, external oblique divided and the cord is encircled after identifying ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. The sac is dissected and reduced, in case of direct hernia the posterior wall of inguinal canal is plicated with polypropylene suture; in presence of indirect hernia the sac is reduced and a stitch is passed in manner that the deep ring is snug about the cord. A pre-shaped mesh is positioned on the floor of the canal around the cord with the two tails overlapping laterally; the mesh is then anchored to the pubic tubercle. External oblique is reapproximated with the cord transposed in the subcutaneous space and skin is sutured.
- PROCEDURE
-
transinguinal preperitoneal patch repair
Through a 5-cm inguinal incision external oblique fascia is divided, cremasteric fibers are separated and the elements of the cord are skeletonized. Indirect or direct hernia is approached and through the hernia orifice, the sac is reduced, preperitoneal space is accessed and dissected to allow easily placement of the patch facilitated by the memory recoil ring. In case of indirect hernia the lateral part of patch is split and the two tails sutured around vas and gonadic vessels. Hernia orifice is closed with a polypropylene stitch through transversalis fascia and the mesh; external oblique is closed followed by skin approximation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
San Bonifacio Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Francesco Orcalli, M.D. · Azienda Ulss 20 Verona
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2007-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2008-12-31
- Completion
- 2011-01-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the 3DMax™ MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in Laparoscopic-endoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
NCT07289802 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Minimally Invasive Open Preperitoneal Surgery With Polysoft Mesh Versus a Classic Open Surgery With Light Weight Mesh
NCT00323674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Implantation for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT01203553 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Outcome After Lichtenstein Operation vs. ProGrip Patch Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT01026935 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT06258317 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtnestein's Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03438786 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A National Center for Persistent Severe Pain After Groin Hernia Repair
NCT03713047 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
NCT00226161 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Results After Endoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia
NCT00683098 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long Term Results of Randomized Prospective Comparison of Onlay and Sublay Mesh Repair Techniques for Incisional Hernia
NCT02314091 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predisposing Factors for Chronic Postherniotomy Pain
NCT00649142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03904888 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT04074200 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Relationship Between Acute Phase Markers and Post-operative Pain in Open Tension-free Inguinal Hernia Repair: An Observational Study
NCT06380140 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Repair
NCT02751190 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic TEP vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03566433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh in Cytoreductive Surgery
NCT03953365 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Laparoscopic Repair of Groin Hernias With One Large Self-fixating Mesh (ProGripTM)
NCT02525666 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR
NCT03935503 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stapler Versus Glue for Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair
NCT00793286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses
NCT01380860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Repair of Groin Hernias After Abdominal Prostatectomy With Robotic TAPP
NCT04718597 ·Status: COMPLETED