Fentanyl Versus Hydromorphone in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation

NCT07224620 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2026-04-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients with respiratory failure who require mechanical ventilation are not only at risk of death, but also of complications of prolonged ICU stay. Patients may have significant functional decline, impact in quality of life, develop psychiatric disorders and at long-term can lead to significant cost to society. Although sedation and analgesia are considered only supportive therapy, several studies have shown that in patients on mechanical ventilation, different approaches can have significant impact on patient centered outcomes. However, to date, randomized clinical trials on critically ill patients have mostly evaluated the sedative agent but not the analgesic agent. Although morphine and its derivates are the most common used opioid analgesic agents in the critical care setting, only some retrospective studies and some prospective studies compared them head-to-head (ramifentanyl versus morphine and fentanyl versus morphine). Current guidelines recommend choosing the analgesic agent based on pharmacokinectics, physician experience and side-effects profile. To evaluate the differences of two standard-of-care analgosedation agents, the FenHydro trial will be a cluster randomized, pragmatic, pilot and feasibility superiority clinical trial in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether there is any difference in morphine milligram equivalents administered during mechanical ventilation.

Conditions

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Sedation and Analgesia
  • Critical Care, Intensive Care

Interventions

DRUG

fentanyl

Suggested initial continuous infusion * Route: Intravenous * Dose: 0-200 mcg/hr (max 1,440 MME/day) * Initial dose: 50mcg/hr * Concentration: 50 mcg/mL * Bolus: 50-200mcg up to every 5 minutes as needed * Continuous infusion adjustment: Increase in the continuous infusion if sedation not at goal after 3 bolus doses, increase by 25 mcg/hr every 60 minutes Titration of dose, initial dose, adjustments and bolus are just suggested. The primary team is allowed to modify them based on clinical judgement.

DRUG

Hydromorphone

Suggested initial continuous infusion * Route: Intravenous * Dose: 0-3 mg/hr (max 1,440 MME/day) * Initial dose: 0.5mg/hr * Concentration: 0.2 mg/mL * Bolus: 0.5-2mg up to every 5 minutes as needed * Continuous infusion adjustment: Increase in the continuous infusion if sedation not at goal after 3 bolus doses, increase by 0.25 mg/hr every 60 minutes Titration of dose, initial dose, adjustments and bolus are just suggested. The primary team is allowed to modify them based on clinical judgement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Elias N Baedorf-Kassis, MD · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-11-03
Primary Completion
2026-04-30
Completion
2026-06-30
FDA Drug
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07224620 on ClinicalTrials.gov