Changes in Soft Tissue Thickness Following Multiple Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) vs Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA)
NCT07200258 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44
Last updated 2026-02-13
Summary
This randomized clinical trial will compare two surgical methods for treating multiple adjacent gingival recessions (types RT1 and RT2): the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) and the Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA). Both methods will use connective tissue grafts (CTG), which are the best way to cover roots.
The main objective is to use three-dimensional (3D) digital volumetric analysis to look at how the thickness of soft tissue has changed after six and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include root coverage, esthetic outcomes, gingival health parameters, hypersensitivity, patient satisfaction, and wound healing quality.
There will be 44 volunteers, and they will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical methods. Under the same settings, periodontal specialists in training will undertake the procedures at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. There will be follow-up evaluations at different times up to 12 months after the procedure. The results of this study will help determine whether remote incisions via the VISTA technique offer improved outcomes compared to the MCAT technique.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA)
Remote incisions will be performed in the test group. The VISTA technique will be performed as described by Zadeh (Zadeh, 2011). After administration of local anaesthesia, an access incision will be made in the vestibulum to permit elevation of a broad subperiosteal tunnel. A specialized periosteal elevator will be used to create the tunnel by dissecting beneath the periosteum, extending at least one tooth beyond the recession defects and under each papilla, without surface incisions at the gingival margin. The connective tissue graft will be inserted and positioned beneath the tunnel through the incision. A coronally anchored suturing technique will be used. This technique mean placing a horizontal mattress suture using a 6.0 suture with at approximately 2 to 3 mm apical to the gingival margin of each tooth, covering the width of the tooth. If keratinized gingiva is present, the suture will be placed within the band of keratinized gingiva.
- PROCEDURE
-
Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT)
In the MCAT group, the surgical approach will follow the technique described by Aroca et al. (2010). After sulcular incisions made without releasing incisions, a full-thickness muco-periosteal tunnel will be carefully elevated beyond the mucogingival junction and under adjacent papillae using tunneling instruments. The root surfaces will be planed, and a subepithelial connective tissue graft will be harvested from the palatal donor site and inserted into the tunnel. Suspended horizontal mattress sutures will be placed around the contact points to advance and stabilize the flap in a position coronal to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) (previous composite at the contact point if necessary). Postoperative care will be identical to that described for the VISTA group.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-15
- Primary Completion
- 2027-07-31
- Completion
- 2028-07-31
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage
NCT03566108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Amount of Root Coverage Following The Use of VISTA Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap in Combination With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Management of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03340987 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Different Tunneling Technique for Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Matertial
NCT06065774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Enamel Matrix Derivative and Connective Tissue Graft in Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT)
NCT06504329 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laterally Closed Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Isolated RT2 Gingival Recession
NCT05823415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Methods to Treat Multiple Gingival Recession Defects
NCT03124329 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage With Connective Tissue Graft Associated With VISTA Versus Tunnel Technique
NCT03690635 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.
NCT03328442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tunnel vs. CAF for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05122468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Morbidity and Root Coverage Outcomes of VISTA Versus CAF in Treating Gingival Recession
NCT06723314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Using Collagen Membrane and A-PRF Using VISTA Technique in Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT06357351 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Increasing the Thickness of Soft Tissues in the Esthetic Zone Around Implants
NCT05551962 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Tuberosity Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06650072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Platelet- Rich Fibrin Membrane Combined With Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access Technique to Treat Localized Gingival Recession
NCT07079293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Partial-thickness/Non-advanced vs. Full-thickness/MCAT Tunnelling for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05655247 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Connective Tissue Graft Versus Collagen Matrix.
NCT04678804 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft
NCT06366022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
NCT07064603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage for Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique and Novomatrix®
NCT06719648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Maxilla.
NCT07158528 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MCAF and EMD With and Without CTG Wall Technique for the Treatment of Class III and IV Gingival recessions-a Randomized Control Trial
NCT06525285 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Selective and Stepwise Excavation in Young Permanent Teeth With Deep Caries Lesions.
NCT06944028 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02916186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA