MCAT Versus VISTA With Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in RT3 Gingival Recession
NCT06433986 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2024-05-30
Summary
This study aims to compare MCAT technique (supraperiosteal approach with coronal advancement of flap) with VISTA technique(subperiosteal approach with coronal advancement of flap), Further, it may be hypothesized that supraperiosteal placement of graft material (in MCAT technique) may be better due to better blood supply, and MCAT technique utilizes a microsurgical concept, including microsurgical blades and suture material, which improves wound healing and establishes a better esthetic result and results in better outcome in terms of root coverage percentage compared to VISTA. Therefore, this study aims to compare minimally invasive technique MCAT and VISTA using VCMX as a graft in RT3 gingival recession in anterior teeth.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT)Technique
Scaling and root planing will be performed and after resolution of gingival inflammation, root coverage procedure will be done with Volume Stable Collagen Matrix(VCMX) using MCAT.
- PROCEDURE
-
Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA)Technique
Scaling and root planing will be performed and after resolution of periodontal inflammation, root coverage procedure will be done with Volume Stable Collagen Matrix(VCMX) using VISTA.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
ROHAN GOYAL, BDS · PGIDS, Rohtak
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-30
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Root Coverage With Connective Tissue Graft Associated With VISTA Versus Tunnel Technique
NCT03690635 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Amount of Root Coverage Following The Use of VISTA Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap in Combination With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Management of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03340987 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Esthetic Root Coverage Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access in Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03588052 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MINST Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation In RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT06044727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions
NCT06755294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Enamel Matrix Derivative and Connective Tissue Graft in Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT)
NCT06504329 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06030947 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Tissue Regeneration in the Healing of Through and Through Lesions
NCT03284736 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage
NCT03566108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Different Tunneling Technique for Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Matertial
NCT06065774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Vestibular Depth on Predictability of Miller Class III/ RT2 Gingival Recession Coverage
NCT06000228 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate the Effect of Graft and Membrane on Healing of Apicomarginal Defects
NCT04366700 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Chorion Membrane With Photobiostimulation ,Chorion Membrane & SCTG in Treating Isolated RT 2 Recession Defects
NCT06433973 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Morbidity and Root Coverage Outcomes of VISTA Versus CAF in Treating Gingival Recession
NCT06723314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparision of Collagen Matrix and Connective Tissue Graft With Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Root Coverage
NCT02876562 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With a MCAF or a MCAT and a Collagen Matrix
NCT04225351 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Laterally Closed Tunnel Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Mandibular Anterior Gingival Recession Defects
NCT04198376 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Suturing Technique on Height of Interdental Papilla and Periodontal Healing
NCT03429764 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
NCT05045586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage for Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique and Novomatrix®
NCT06719648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
m-VISTA Technique vs. CAF in the Treatment of Class III Multiple Recessions
NCT03258996 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Role of GTR on Healing Outcome & Quality of Life in Combined Endo Perio Lesions With Communication
NCT06643663 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CAF With Either SCTG and Vitamin C Versus SCTG Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT04632693 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA