Connective Tissue Graft Versus Collagen Matrix.
NCT04678804 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 13
Last updated 2025-04-17
Summary
Despite the potential role of soft tissue thickness in maintaining gingival margin stability, the existing literature has mainly focused on investigating the effect of different surgical techniques on recession coverage percentage, without taking into account the changes in tissue thickness and biotype in the surgical area. Hence, this study aims to compare threedimensional scans of gingival recessions treated either with CAF+CTG or with CAF+PDCM by the use of a dedicated superimposition software at different healing timepoints.
The primary outcome is to assess the change in mm3 and the distribution pattern of soft tissue thickening in the surgical area between autologous and heterologous grafts at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery. The secondary outcomes are: the complete root coverage at 6 months post surgery and Patients' Reported Outcomes (PROMS) measured with oral impact on daily performances (OIDP questionnaire) and on the evaluation of patients' perception about therapy.
Conditions
- Gingival Diseases
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Mucogingival surgery for single recession coverage
The control group will be treated with a coronally advanced flap with vertical incisions (CAF) associated to an autologous connective tissue graft. The graft will be harvested from the palate in the area apical to the gingival margin of the second molar with an epithelial-connective harvesting technique to obtain a connective graft of 1 mm in thickness. Subsequently, the graft will be shaped in order to match height and width of the recipient site on the recession according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli in 2003. The test group will receive the same flap design with the same technique, then the porcine derived xenogeneic graft will be shaped in order to match height and width of the recipient site on the recession. In particular, the matrix will be reduced in thickness as suggested by the manufacturer to obtain a standardized thickness of 3 mm.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Parma
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Elena Calciolari, DDS · Researcher
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-02
- Completion
- 2023-05-18
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession-type Defects Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT02788266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Xenogenic Collagen Matrix for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05693753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Protocol for Prevention of Mucositis
NCT04628520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Connective Tissue Graft Versus Mucograft Collagen Matrix for Coverage of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects
NCT01440426 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A New Surgical-restorative Approach to Treat Gingival Recessions Associated With Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCCL)
NCT02817763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Early Maxillary Implants
NCT07024186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Tuberosity Micro Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects
NCT06650072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02916186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Connective Graft and Xenogeneic Matrix, in Patients With Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03207984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gain of Keratinized Mucosa Around Teeth and Dental Implants Using a Combination of Strip Gingival Graft and Acellular Dermal Matrix
NCT04920136 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Platelet-rich Fibrin and Connective Tissue Graft in Interdental Papilla Reconstruction
NCT05207696 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implant
NCT06238427 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Soft Tissue Management in Peri-Implant Regions
NCT06880185 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions
NCT06006780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Platelet-Rich Fibrin Prepared With Titanium in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05270941 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Linear Incision for Connective Tissue
NCT06365983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bi-layer Collagen Membrane Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession
NCT07162207 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in RT2 Gingival Recession Compared to Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05568732 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of CTG and T-PRF on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue
NCT04042194 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Keratized Mucosa in CG Implant Placement: CTG vs Flapless
NCT05073952 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mucoderm® Versus CTG in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions Associated With Non-carious Cervical Lesion.
NCT03594513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects Using a New Xenogenic Collagen Membrane Compared to Connective Tissue Graft: a Randomized Controlled Split-mouth Clinical Study
NCT04800250 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study
NCT04109794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA