Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02290314 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2018-08-20
Summary
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is the forward displacement (slip) of one vertebra on an adjacent vertebra resulting in narrowing of the spinal canal or compression of the exiting nerve roots. It is commonly associated with low back and leg pain, and is a frequent reason for spine surgery particularly in individuals over age 65 years. Recently novel minimally invasive surgical techniques have heightened public and government interest by touting benefits of reduced approached-related morbidity which in turn leads to quicker recovery, shorter hospital stay, improved short-term clinical outcomes, and reduced health care cost. However, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to describe the actual advantages and disadvantages associated with minimally invasive spinal fusion. This pilot study is a randomized control trial comparing minimally invasive MID-line Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF) to traditional "open" posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with respect to length of stay, approach related morbidity, patient centered outcome measures, and cost-effectiveness in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Conditions
- Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
minimally invasive MID-line Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF)
- PROCEDURE
-
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The London Spine Centre
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Chris Bailey · London Health Sciences Centre and Western University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-12-31
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Instability in the Lumbar Spine of Patients With Age Related Changes and Narrowing of the Spinal Canal (Spinal Stenosis)
NCT04406987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Crenel Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for LSS Combined With Lumbar Instability
NCT06058143 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04778943 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT06749314 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
OLIF25™ /OLIF51™ Study
NCT02657421 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Clinical Study of Imaging and Endoplant-related Mechanical Complications After Long Segment Fixation and Fusion of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis (DLS)
NCT04960423 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Midline Versus Paramedian Approaches in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03344484 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Balance Amongst Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06075862 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02348645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Survivorship of Decompression Alone Vs Decomp With Fusion in DLS and LCS
NCT05386381 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT03726190 ·Status: SUSPENDED
-
Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
NCT01045473 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
XLIF® vs. MAS®TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis.
NCT01024699 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Preliminary Effectiveness of NVD-001 for the Treatment of Low Grade Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03100032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Restoring Segmental Lumbar Lordosis After Failed Previous Fusion at the Same Level
NCT07050290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT05190055 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Anterior vs. Posterior Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
NCT02564705 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Interbody Spacers With map3® Cellular Allogeneic Bone Graft in Anterior or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02628210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Bilateral Decompression With Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis
NCT02972190 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT03692845 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine Diseases
NCT06545032 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT07127380 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SLIP II Registry: Spinal Laminectomy Versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw Fusion
NCT03570801 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing Risk Factors for Radiological Complications After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT05266638 ·Status: COMPLETED