Patient-Specific vs. Conventional Positioning in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
NCT07125963 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2025-08-15
Summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and positioning accuracy of a custom-made proximal segment positioning appliance designed for use in sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The appliance is produced using STL-based digital planning and 3D printing technologies. In each patient, the appliance is applied to one side of the mandible while the contralateral side is positioned using the conventional manual method. This within-subject design enables direct comparison by eliminating inter-individual anatomical variability. The primary outcome is the accuracy of segment positioning, evaluated by 3D superimposition and deviation analysis of pre- and postoperative STL models. Secondary outcomes include surgical time, ease of use as rated by the surgeon, and postoperative temporomandibular joint symptoms. The study will enroll 30 adult patients undergoing SSRO or double-jaw surgery due to dentofacial deformities. The results are expected to provide high-level clinical evidence for the reliability of patient-specific appliances in orthognathic surgery.
Conditions
- Dentofacial Deformities
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Custom-made positioning appliance-assisted mandibular segment repositioning
A patient-specific surgical guide designed using STL-based digital planning in Blender and produced via 3D printing with biocompatible surgical resin (Formlabs SLA printer). Used to guide and stabilize the proximal mandibular segment during sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Manual Positioning
The proximal mandibular segment is positioned manually by the surgeon based on visual and tactile feedback without the use of a positioning guide. This technique represents the standard method in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sümer Münevveroğlu
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-25
- Primary Completion
- 2026-07-30
- Completion
- 2026-10-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Tooth-Borne Face Mask Therapy Following the Alt-RAMEC Protocol
NCT07279662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Using the Inverted Sequence Approach
NCT03353116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of 3D-Printed Anatomical Model on Patient Understanding in Orthognathic Surgery
NCT07068412 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Splint Usage in Laterognathic Cl III Orthognathic Surgery Patients
NCT05216874 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Custom Made Plate in Orthognathic Surgery
NCT06772688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Repositioning With bi or Tripartite Disjonction by Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery Using Patient-specific Titanium Plates
NCT05186376 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Evaluation of Customized Attachment Composites in Clear Aligner Therapy
NCT07261735 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Custom Titanium Plates vs. 3D Splints in LeFort I Osteotomy
NCT06933628 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Personalized Titanium Plates vs CAD/CAM Surgical Splints in Maxillary Repositioning of Orthognathic Surgery
NCT02914431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Appliance for Orthognathic Surgery
NCT05009056 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances
NCT04810286 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Accuracy of Maxilla Between Virtual and Conventional Surgical Planning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery
NCT06940024 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Postural Exercises in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders
NCT06707467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays
NCT06167278 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Validity of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Set up
NCT05549089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Outcomes After Receiving Conventional Clasp or Precision Attachment Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT02924142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Facial Conformation Meshes for Orthognathic Surgery
NCT06893614 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Masseter and Anterior Temporalis Muscles Activity After Locating Centric Relation
NCT06095856 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Occlusal Stabilization Splints Fabricated Using Conventional Versus Fully Digital Workflow
NCT07074340 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Retro-molar Pad Demarcation on Complete Denture Wearers' Satisfaction
NCT07246343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Printing and Three-Dimensional Miniplates in Treatment of Anterior Mandibular Fractures
NCT06898736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of the Transfer Accuracy of Semi-Digital and Fully Digital Indirect Bonding Trays
NCT07318857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Bite Force Changes After Surgical Correction of the Increased Vertical Dimension
NCT04376645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Surgery First Approach and Aligners
NCT05822271 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency
NCT04863404 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA