The Left Bundle Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial
NCT05434962 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 176
Last updated 2025-07-17
Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular (BiV) pacing significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), impaired LV function and heart failure in spite of optimal medical treatment. CRT positive effects are based on the existence of an electromechanical dyssynchrony induced by the abnormal activation sequence associated with the presence of a left bundle branch block (LBBB), which is thought to be responsible for a negative LV remodeling leading to LVEF impairment and heart failure progression. However, one third of patients undergoing CRT are considered non responders due to different reasons. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality aiming for conduction system recruitment in patients with normal or impaired atrioventricular conduction, including patients with LBBB. LBBAP achieves LBBB correction in up to 85% of the cases and thus could be a promising pacing modality for CRT candidates.
Conditions
- Left Bundle-Branch Block
- Heart Failure
- Impaired Left Ventricular Function
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Standard BiV-CRT The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's manual provided with the devices. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. The LV lead should be implanted at a lateral or posterolateral CS branch in a basal or mid ventricular position confirmed by ortogonal fluoroscopic views (RAO and LAO 40º). Acceptable LV pacing threshold should be \<3V@0,5ms and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) margin should be \>1V with respect to the pacing threshold. LBBAP-CRT The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA). For LBBAP, the Medtronic 3830 lead will be used. Acceptable LBBAP threshold should be \<2,5V@0,5ms
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Spanish Society of Cardiology
collaborator OTHER -
Óscar Cano Pérez
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-27
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-30
- Completion
- 2025-08-31
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Prospective ranDomized Trial to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Vs Cardiac ResynchronIzatioN Therapy With ECG guIded AV Optimization
NCT07107048 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01193712 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
RESynchronisation in Patients With Heart Failure and a Normal QRS Duration
NCT00480051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Bi-ventricular Epicardial Activation in Left Bundle Area Pacing: a Comparison Study
NCT05401851 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
LEft VEntricuLar Activation Time Shortening With Physiological Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04054895 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Comparison of Endocardial Versus Epicardial - From the Coronary Sinus - Left Ventricular Pacing for Resynchronization in Heart Failure.
NCT01260402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Ventricular Septal Pacing: Potential Application for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT03415945 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Ejection Fraction Below Normal
NCT06148571 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients After TAVR
NCT05024279 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT06488989 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Atrioventricular Block
NCT05129098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Efficacy and Safety Research of Left Bundle Branch Pacing
NCT05600699 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mapping and Pacing of the His Bundle for Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block
NCT03803995 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of Transvenous Versus Epicardial Left Ventricular Stimulation Technique
NCT00819117 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
STylet-driven vs. LumenlEss Lead in Left-Bundle-Branch Pacing
NCT06049992 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block)
NCT04730921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trajectory Changes of Coronary Sinus Lead Tip and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcome
NCT02340546 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved LVEF
NCT07250529 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Left Ventricular Pacing Site
NCT00221780 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Direct HIS-pacing as an Alternative to BiV-pacing in Symptomatic HFrEF Patients With True LBBB
NCT03614169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Evaluating the Benefit of Left Bundle Branch Area Stimulation Compared With Conventional Pacing in Post-TAVI Atrioventricular Atrioventricular Block
NCT07236489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
AI-Guided Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
NCT07206602 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanisms and Innovations in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT04221763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct HIS/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With HFrEF and a Typical LBBB.
NCT04409119 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Septal Pacing or Left Bundle Branch Pacing to Avoid Left Ventricle Systolic Dysfunction
NCT06707662 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA