MedTrace Logo

*Effect of Prophylactic CBD Stenting Versus Non Stenting on Recurrence of CBD Stones in Patients Awaiting Cholecystectomy*

NCT07084493 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 88

Last updated 2025-08-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Primary objective:

Compare recurrence rates of CBD stones in stented versus non-stented patients.

Secondary objectives:

Identify predictors of stone recurrence. Assess the incidence and risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Evaluate time to recurrence and rate of hospital readmissions. Explore impact on quality of life and ease of subsequent cholecystectomy.

Conditions

  • Calcular Obstructive Jaundice

Interventions

DEVICE

CBD stent either a 7-Fr and 7 cm or a 10-Fr and 7-cm OR double-pigtail stent

prophylactic CBD stent either a 7-Fr and 7 cm or a 10-Fr and 7-cm double-pigtail stent

DEVICE

biliary stent

prophylactic CBD stent either a 7-Fr and 7 cm or a 10-Fr and 7-cm double-pigtail stent

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-08-31
Primary Completion
2026-09-30
Completion
2026-12-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07084493 on ClinicalTrials.gov