One vs. Two Stents for Gallbladder Disease
NCT07222527 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2025-12-16
Summary
This randomized trial will look at whether placing two cystic duct stents is more effective than one cystic duct stent in preventing recurrent gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) among patients who are not immediate surgical candidates for removal of their gallbladder.
The study will evaluate the safety profile, including rates of recurrent cholecystitis, biliary colic, and procedure-related complications, and technical success, defined as successful placement of stents into the gallbladder.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does placement of two transpapillary cystic duct stents reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic gallbladder disease compared to one stent?
2. Is there a difference in procedure-related adverse events (post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholangitis, stent migration) between the two strategies?
Researchers will compare outcomes between patients randomized to one stent versus two stents to determine which approach provides better long-term gallbladder drainage and fewer recurrent events.
Participants will:
Be evaluated for eligibility and provide informed consent prior to undergoing an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), an endoscopy where a guidewire is placed into the bile duct from the small intestine.
They will then undergo ERCP with transpapillary cystic duct stent placement, randomized to one or two stents.
All participants will receive standard post-procedure care and follow-up assessments for recurrence, adverse events, and need for reintervention.
Conditions
- Recurrent Cholecystitis
- Cholecystitis
- Symptomatic Gallbladder Disease
- Biliary Colic
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
ERCP with one stent placement
One transpapillary cystic duct stent will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP
- PROCEDURE
-
ERCP with two stent placement
Two transpapillary cystic duct stents will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Eric Vargas · Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 95 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-12-12
- Primary Completion
- 2027-05-27
- Completion
- 2028-05-27
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Role of Prophylactic Biliary Stent in Reducing the Recurrence of Choledocholithiasis
NCT06060002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Bacteremia and Cholangitis in ERCP With Cholangioscopy
NCT02543957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Randomized Trial of ERCP Then Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Plus Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients With Likely Choledocholithiasis
NCT00807729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Winged Versus Traditional Plastic Stents for Biliary Drainage
NCT06960733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Duodenoscope With Single-use Distal Cover and the Conventional Reusable Duodenoscope
NCT05429203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate vs. Elective Endoscopic Removal of Large CBD Stones in High-Risk Elderly Patients
NCT06948279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Stenting Across the Papilla Versus the Leak Site to Treat Bile Leak
NCT03103139 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Supra-papillary Versus Trans-papillary Biliary Stenting in Malignant Peri-hilar Stenosis
NCT07325877 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent and Postoperative ERCP Compared to Intraoperative ERCP
NCT06817291 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
CBD Stenting vs Non-Stenting for Choledocholithiasis
NCT07331142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double Stent for Biliary Stones in Cirrhotic Patients
NCT07337291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Acute Cholecystitis With ETGBD
NCT06287112 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Infection Control in ERCP Using a Duodenoscope With a Disposable Cap
NCT04040504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Percutaneous vs. Endoscopic Drainage of Suspected Klatskin Tumors
NCT03172832 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT of the Double Wire Technique for Sphincterotomy
NCT01792466 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Nasogallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Cholecystecomy
NCT02394327 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating the Effect of Biliary Stenting on EAU-FNA in Patients With Suspected Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT01514058 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Trial for Extraction of Difficult Bile Duct Stones
NCT00852072 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS - Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures
NCT03000855 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Randomized Controlled Trial on Pancreatic Stent Tube in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT00628186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biliary Drainage in Patients With Duodenal Metal Stent
NCT02376907 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Quality of Life Assessment Between Internal Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Drainage in Biliary Obstruction
NCT04857424 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP
NCT03482375 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early Precut Versus Pancreatic Stent for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT02497872 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing ERCP vs ERCP and Transmural Gall Bladder Drainage
NCT03921502 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA