MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Winged Versus Traditional Plastic Stents for Biliary Drainage

NCT06960733 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 21

Last updated 2025-05-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study was randomized, controlled, blinded trial with a two-arm parallel-group design to directly compare the therapeutic outcomes of winged versus conventional stents in patients with benign or malignant biliopancreatic conditions requiring ERCP and subsequent insertion or replacement of plastic stents.

Conditions

  • Biliary Obstruction
  • Bile Duct Stones
  • Biliary Tract Cancer

Interventions

DEVICE

Winged plastic stent

Patient with need for stenting of bile duct were randomised for kind of stents. Stents used were either standard plastic stents or stents with winged design. In this Intervention winged stents were used.

DEVICE

Standard plastic stents

Patient with need for stenting of bile duct were randomised for kind of stents. Stents used were either standard plastic stents or stents with winged design. In this Intervention standard plastic stents were used.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Leipzig

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Albrecht Hoffmeister, Professor · University of Leipzig Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-06-01
Primary Completion
2013-04-30
Completion
2013-12-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06960733 on ClinicalTrials.gov