Optimizing the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suspected Choledocholithiasis
NCT05141916 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 2000
Last updated 2026-04-29
Summary
Choledocholithiasis (stone(s) in the common bile duct) is common. Untreated or missed, choledocholithiasis has high morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is recognized as the first-line modality for management. While effective, ERCP is associated with adverse events. Thus, the selection of patients for ERCP should be accompanied by a high pre-test suspicion of choledocholithiasis.
Choledocholithiasis is suspected based on clinical, biochemical and radiographic findings. The most relied-upon strategy for risk stratification of choledocholithiasis is based on guidelines from The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). In it, clinical predictors are defined as "very strong", "strong" or "moderate", and the presence of one or more of these is meant to suggest "high" or "intermediate" probability of choledocholithiasis.
A knowledge gap exists in the performance characteristics of intermediate-probability criteria, where overall accuracy is \<50% from limited data. Patients in this group are recommended to a) undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP), b) undergo cholecystectomy with intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), or c) proceed directly to ERCP. At centres where EUS and MRCP are readily available, these are preferred options, as they are least invasive and sensitive; however, they are often unavailable. Thus, in clinical practice, a high proportion of intermediate-risk patients ultimately proceed directly to ERCP, where likelihood of benefit is only moderate, while procedural risk remains.
The role of liver enzyme changes has not been evaluated; however, dynamic changes may offer another method for evaluating patients at intermediate risk of CBD stones that is safe and available. Incorporation of dynamic liver enzymes may improve the test-performance characteristics of the existing framework.
Conditions
- Biliary Disease
- Choledocholithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholagiopancreatography (ERCP)
Endoscopic procedure employed to manage biliary and pancreatic diseases
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Calgary
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nauzer Forbes, MD, MSc · University of Calgary
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-02-25
- Primary Completion
- 2028-12-31
- Completion
- 2029-06-30
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Comparisons of One-stage Stone Removal in Mild and Moderate Cholangitis
NCT03754491 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Need for Repeat ERCP After Endoscopic Treatment of Postsurgical Biliary Leaks
NCT05141942 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Impact on Outcome of Early Endoscopic Extraction of Bile Duct Stones in Biliary Pancreatitis
NCT00505128 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones : What Are the Limits and When Should we Call the Endoscopist ?
NCT04467710 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Failed Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Stone Extraction: Surgical Interference
NCT05746832 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP
NCT03482375 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Clinical Utility of Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Pancreaticobiliary Disorders
NCT00861198 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Guidewire Management in ERCP
NCT05219123 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Biliary Exploration in Complex Biliary Stone Disease
NCT04308993 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of LCBDE vs ERCP + LC for Choledocholithiasis
NCT02515474 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly
NCT07001423 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ETGBD in Surgically Unfit Patients With Both Choledocholithiasis and Cholecystolithiasis
NCT05935969 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Bacteremia and Cholangitis in ERCP With Cholangioscopy
NCT02543957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Clinical Trial Comparing ERCP vs ERCP and Transmural Gall Bladder Drainage
NCT03921502 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Cholangioscopy Versus ERCP in the Diagnosis of Biliary Strictures
NCT04010734 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Choleretics in Acalculous Gallbladder in Situ After Endoscopic Removal of Biliary Stones
NCT01829139 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cholangioscopic Assessment of Occluded Biliary Stent and Role of Biliary Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT03133026 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Value of Percutaneous Cholangioscopy After Placement of a Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage
NCT00942630 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early Versus Late Cholecystectomy After Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT02460315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of the Sequence of Dilatation and Lithotripsy on the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis With ERCP
NCT05035433 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Versus Mechanical Lithotripsy of Bile Duct Stones
NCT01759979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Pre and Intraoperative ERCP in Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT01046552 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant High Grade Biliary Stricture
NCT03530527 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of 3D Laparoscopy Versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
NCT04658212 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Microbiological Assessment of Bile in Patients Undergone to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERCP): the "Microbile Registry"
NCT06115564 ·Status: RECRUITING