Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Straight Line and W-plasty Techniques for Linear Wound Closure
NCT05074199 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2021-10-12
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the cosmetic outcome of traditional straight-line (SL) linear closure to that of W plasty (a type of geometric broken-line cutaneous closure technique) for closure of post-auricular wounds resulting from harvest of full thickness skin grafts during Mohs micrographic surgery. The research team will use a split wound model, where half of the wound is repaired with a straight-line cutaneous closure and the other half is repaired with the W-plasty technique. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be measured via the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), a validated scar instrument. The scar width, and adverse events will also be recorded.
Conditions
- Suture Dermatologic
- Surgery
- Cosmetic Outcome
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
W-plasty/Linear closure
The patient's wound will be labeled A if it is on the left or superior side of the investigator and B if it is on the right or inferior side. A predetermined, concealed randomization number will be obtained from the RedCap randomization module, which will specify how side A is to be treated. Side B will be treated the opposite way as A. Side A will always be closed first. The side assigned to be closed in a traditional straight line (SL) will have the standing cutaneous deformity ("dog ear") excised in the standard manner using Burrow's triangles, resulting in an elliptical defect amenable to linear closure. The side assigned to be closed with W-plasty will have the dog ear excised in a zig-zag fashion consistent with the W plasty flap design. Both sides of the wound will receive subcuticular closure with interrupted subdermal sutures as is the standard of care, followed by a standard running cuticular closure with absorbable suture material.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of California, Davis
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-26
- Primary Completion
- 2021-08-31
- Completion
- 2021-09-01
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Wound Eversion Versus Planar Closure for Face or Neck Wounds
NCT03302988 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Aesthetic Surgical Wound Closure by a Single Layer in Comparison With Traditional Multi-layer Closure
NCT05166681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Cuticular Suture Distance (2mm vs 5mm)
NCT04870008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Undermining During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02289859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02547077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interrupted Subdermal Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis
NCT03327922 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy
NCT01907542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Undermining Apices in Surgical Wounds
NCT05758181 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Running Locking Suture vs Standard Running Suture in Surgical Wounds
NCT06288009 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Wound Closure
NCT03303027 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Wound Edge Eversion on Cosmesis
NCT00872638 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Suturing Distance From the Wound Edge, 2 mm vs 5 mm
NCT03330041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Sutures vs Staples for High Tension Closures
NCT06638736 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance
NCT01352533 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes Comparing Different Methods of Skin Closure in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery.
NCT02936063 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Post-market Study to Evaluate Zip Device Compared to Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics and Adults
NCT03199456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sutures Versus Glue in Laparoscopic Port Site Closure.
NCT03843866 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Eversion in Dermatologic Surgery: Is Cosmetic Appearance Improved?
NCT01770002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthopaedic Surgical Wound Closure Comparison Study
NCT05251064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Zip Incision Approximation vs. Suture for C-Section
NCT02915952 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure
NCT06016426 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations
NCT00681070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial of Subcuticular Staples Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Section Skin Closure
NCT01753518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA