Early Clinical Benefits of Robot-Assisted vs Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty (RATKA-EARLY)
NCT07078149 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 68
Last updated 2025-07-22
Summary
This study, called the RATKA-EARLY trial, was designed to compare two surgical techniques used in total knee replacement (also known as total knee arthroplasty or TKA). The aim was to determine whether the use of a robotic surgical system (ROSA® Knee System) offers short-term clinical advantages over the traditional manual technique.
A total of 68 adult patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis scheduled for TKA were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 34 patients underwent robot-assisted TKA (RATKA), and 34 underwent conventional manual TKA (mTKA). All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgical team, using the same type of implant.
Researchers assessed intraoperative and perioperative variables (such as surgical duration and blood loss), and evaluated early clinical outcomes at 3 months postoperatively by comparing pain levels, implant alignment, knee function, mobility, and overall patient satisfaction with baseline values.
The study was conducted at Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina in Madrid, Spain. It was approved by the local ethics committee and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and international research guidelines.
By comparing these two surgical approaches, the study aims to help patients and healthcare professionals make informed decisions regarding total knee replacement options.
Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
- Total Knee Arthroplasty
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA).
RATKA was performed using the ROSA® Knee System.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional manual TKA (mTKA)
mTKA was performed without robot assistance.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Inmaculada Neira, M.D. · Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-03-28
- Primary Completion
- 2024-10-30
- Completion
- 2024-12-16
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Versus Conventional TKA
NCT05987839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted TKA
NCT06062615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Medial Congruent Vs. Conventional Medial Pivot TKA
NCT06858358 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Accuracy and Functional Outcome Between Robotic and Gyroscopic Assisted Surgery in Primary TKA
NCT06321952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06821269 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty vs. Conventional One
NCT04611815 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Navigation-assisted OrthoPilot® Elite and Robotic-assisted MAKO® Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05980442 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic-assisted (MAKO) Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT07201207 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Personalized Approach to Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05750784 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Functionally Aligned vs Mechanical Axis Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04748510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After UKA
NCT05204797 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mako Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Mako Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04092153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Navigation-Assisted TKA Using Mechanical vs. Restricted Kinematic Alignment
NCT05516381 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing Robotically-Assisted vs. Manually-Executed Total Knee Arthroplasties
NCT03482349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Radiological, Clinical, Functional Outcomes Between Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04183985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Standard and Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Bicrucatie Retaining Prosthesis
NCT04334304 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Robot Assisted Total Knee Replacement Outcomes
NCT03523897 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Anatomically Aligned and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients
NCT04181216 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
NCT04976972 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment With Gait Analysis of Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Inverse Kinematic Alignment
NCT04912973 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Adjusted Mechanical Alignment With Robotic-assisted Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT06835621 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RSA Restoris MultiCompartmental Knee
NCT05417984 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty Using an Active Robotic System
NCT04667390 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Surgical and Economical Parameters of Total Knee Replacement.
NCT03427047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Implant Positioning With Robotic Aided Surgery and Traditional Jig Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03052790 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA