This Randomized, Single-center Trial Aims to Evaluate the Advantages of Underwater ESD (U-ESD) in Comparison to the Conventional ESD (C-ESD).
NCT07040020 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 122
Last updated 2026-04-21
Summary
Large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions are increasingly detected thanks to screening programs worldwide. ESD is the technique which provides a high-quality resection of these large polyps.
Nevertheless, colorectal ESD is burdened by technical difficulties and several adverse events affecting its outcomes. The adverse events could be life-threatening, call for or prolong the hospitalization, require blood transfusion, additional endoscopic or surgical procedures and increase costs. Failure of endoscopic resection requiring surgery for benign lesions could affect patients' quality of life and increase healthcare systems' costs.
Thus, improving colorectal ESD outcomes is an important clinical and medico-economic objective. The underwater setting with saline has been already established as a better option than conventional CO2 insufflation for EMR of large colonic polyps. Moreover, use of the underwater approach for colorectal ESD has been increasingly reported with good results in the last few years. However, a randomized comparative trial between conventional and underwater colorectal ESD clarifying which should be the preferred approach is lacking.
Expected benefits are a decrease of adverse events and an increase of successful R0 resection rate of colorectal ESD.
Conditions
- Precancerous Lesions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Underwater ESD (U-ESD)
Underwater ESD (U-ESD): after filling the lumen with saline and sucking all the air, initial submucosal injection of saline and methylene blue is performed; subsequent mucosal incision with ESD knife all around the lesion and submucosal dissection deep in the submucosal layer leading to an en bloc resection is carried out
- OTHER
-
Conventional ESD (C-ESD)
Conventional ESD (C-ESD): under CO2 insufflation, initial submucosal injection of saline and methylene blue is performed; subsequent mucosal incision with ESD knife all around the lesion and submucosal dissection deep in the submucosal layer leading to an en bloc resection is carried out.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-26
- Completion
- 2026-03-26
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
ESD for Colorectal LSL Using a Selective Strategy - a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT04008407 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
DeFect cLOsure After Colonic ESD With underwaTer Technique
NCT04214678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrence Rate After Endoscopic Resection of , Laterally Spreading Tumor Granular Type (LST-G) of the Colon and Rectum: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT06815406 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
French Colorectal ESD Cohort in Experts Centers
NCT04592003 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Efficacy
NCT01879904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Large Non Pedunculated Colonic Adenomas: a Randomized Comparative Trial
NCT03962868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Hybrid-ESD+ and LiftUp® on the en Bloc/R0 Rate in Colorectal Adenomas Between 2 and 3 cm
NCT05517369 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
An Endoscopic Barbed-clips Suturing for Colorectal ESD
NCT05045911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Colorectal ESD and Traditional Colorectal ESD Surgery
NCT06076382 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hot EMR vs Underwater Cold EMR for Large Colonic Adenomas
NCT06217250 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Metal Clips With Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Big Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06097637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-curative ESDs: Assessing the Rates and Risk Factors for Residual Neoplasia
NCT04484311 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Additive Hemostatic Efficacy of EndoClot After EMR or ESD in the Gastrointestinal Tract
NCT02688699 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outcomes of Perforation After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT05728710 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Water-jet Assisted ESD vs Conventional ESD Technique for Treating Early Gastric Cancer
NCT01943253 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study on a New Endoscopic Platform for the ESD of Colorectal Lesions: Tissue Retraction System
NCT03553199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
NCT01378507 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs. Transanal Endoscopic Surgery for Rectal Neoplasia
NCT06902701 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05825664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR for Medium-sized Pedunculated Colon Polyps
NCT04837690 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Complete Closure After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06807073 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02245854 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasm
NCT06973083 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT04232176 ·Status: COMPLETED