Hot EMR vs Underwater Cold EMR for Large Colonic Adenomas
NCT06217250 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 330
Last updated 2024-04-18
Summary
This randomized, multi-center trial aims to evaluate the advantages of underwater cold endoscopic mucosal resection technique (CS-EMR) in comparison to the conventional endoscopic mucosal resection technique (EMR) for laterally spreading colorectal lesions exceeding 20 mm in size. More precisely, our hypothesis posits that underwater cold EMR is non-inferior to conventional EMR in terms of recurrence rates, resection completeness and safety.
Conditions
- Colonic Neoplasms
- Colonic Adenoma
- Colonic Lesion
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Traditional EMR
Conventional EMR with thermal ablation of resection margins: initial submucosal injection of saline and methylene blue and subsequent piecemeal resection with 10- or 15-mm diathermic snare with subsequent thermal ablation of resection margins with snare tip soft coagulation.Nevertheless, this technique is associated with the emergence of serious adverse events (SAEs), including delayed bleeding (PPB), electrocautery-induced post-polipectomy syndrome (PPS), and perforation(4).
- PROCEDURE
-
the cold snare ("CO"), underwater technique ("W"), and the use of submucosal lift ("L") in both study arms
The "cold-EMR" technique, as opposed to the conventional approach, employs a specialized snare that enables tissue transection without the need for electrical current, particularly in appropriately selected lesions. This approach yields the same efficacy outcome as the conventional procedure but offers the advantage of reducing the risks associated with polypectomy, which are often secondary to the use of diathermic current. Subsequently, the lesion fragments are retrieved for histological examination. Furthermore, the use of underwater setting, as demonstrated for hot EMR, could improve the effectiveness of cold-EMR.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-04-15
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-01-31
More Related Trials
-
Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions
NCT04418843 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy, Safety and Recurrence After Cold-EMR Plus APC for Large Colonic Lesions
NCT06435377 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR Versus HSP in the Treatment of Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Less Than 10mm in Size
NCT06996522 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Metal Clips With Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Big Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06097637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02484079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.
NCT04451512 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cold or Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10-19mm Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05545787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05825664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
R0 Resection Rate Between CSP, cEMR and hEMR for 1-2 cm Colorectal SSLs
NCT05117879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR vs. CEMR for Diminutive Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT03833492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (C-EMR) Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (H-EMR) for Large Colorectal Polyps (10-20 mm)
NCT06180798 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT01646242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs Cold EMR With Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
NCT05041478 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy
NCT03501849 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quad Resection (Hot Snare vs Cold Snare vs Hot EMR vs Cold EMR)
NCT03462706 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Lateral Spreading Lesions - A Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT04138030 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-resection Treatment of Large Colon Polyps
NCT03654209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
DeFect cLOsure After Colonic ESD With underwaTer Technique
NCT04214678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Non-thermal Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT07242820 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid-APC Margin Ablation to Prevent Post EMR Adenoma Recurrence
NCT04015765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypectomy With Hot vs Cold Snare in Small Colonic Lesions
NCT03783156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Full Thickness Resection or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Difficult Colorectal Lesions.
NCT05502276 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA