MedTrace Logo

Comparison Rectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

NCT02198729 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2025-03-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators have recently become proficient in a new, and we believe more effective technique for polyp removal. Known as Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). ESD involves removing the polyp in one piece. It is preferable to remove the polyp in one piece as it minimises the chance of leaving residual polyp tissue behind. There have also been recent studies overseas that have shown this new technique to be quite effective. In this study, half of the patients will receive the newly developed technique of polyp removal (ESD), while the other half will receive conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) treatment. This study will allow us to show which technique results in lower recurrence rates and is more effective.

Conditions

  • Colonic Polyps

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Professor Michael Bourke

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Michael J Bourke, MBBS · Western Sydney Local Health District

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-07-31
Primary Completion
2019-05-31
Completion
2019-05-31

Countries

  • Australia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02198729 on ClinicalTrials.gov