EFFICACY of INTRAOPERATIVE ARISTA POLYSACCHARIDE APPLICATION on the POSTOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS in PATIENTS UNDERGOING RARP for the TREATMENT of PROSTATE CANCER
NCT06822036 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 362
Last updated 2025-02-17
Summary
Background and aim of the study: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most commonly used treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Blood loss and deterioration of erectile function is, however, a common unwanted side effect of RP. Previous series demonstrated that the robot-assisted RP (RARP) approach is associated with lower blood-loss rates than open RP. However, several factors might contribute to higher blood loss rates at RARP: First, ileus still represents a major complication. To further reduce complication rates of postoperative ileus most high-volume centers lower the intraabdominal pressure during RARP, which in turn might lead to higher estimated blood loss rates. Second, to improve functional outcomes such as erectile function and early recovery of urinary continence, many surgeons perform intrafascial nerve sparing, which is considered a dissection that follows the periprostatic fasica and allows a whole-thickness preservation of the neurovascular bundles. Ideally, many surgeons aim to avoid thermal application in favor of optimal nerve sparing quality. Moreover, partial or complete secondary resection in context of intraoperative frozen section protocols such as NeuroSafe might further increase risk of blood loss. Taken together, to enable best balance between low intraabdominal pressure as primary prevention of postoperative ileus, maximum nerve sparing quality (i.e. intrafascial approach) and low blood loss rates, atraumatic and athermal hemostatic measures such as polysaccharide application are needed. Thus, we perform a multicenter randomized controlled prospective study with superiority trial design, in which such hemostat agent is applied to the neurovascular bundle areas. We examine if such agent leads to a relevant clinical improvement indicated by higher postoperative hemoglobin levels compared to the control group. As an exploratory co-primary endpoint of interest, we examine erectile function after RARP. Erectile dysfunction (ED) after RP is caused by several different mechanisms and commonly multifactorial. However, one of the main reasons for ED after RP is injury to the cavernous nerves during surgery. Currently, nerve-sparing surgical approaches are commonly performed, if oncologically appropriate, to minimize postoperative potency decline. Notwithstanding improvements of nerve-sparing techniques, a certain degree of nerve damage during surgery is inevitable. In order to keep the rates of postoperative ED at a minimum, it is reasonable to stabilize the cavernous nerves during surgery. In a previous pilot conducted by Chedid et al, the polysaccharide ARISTA™ AH was applicated on the cavernous nerves during robot-assisted RP (RARP) to optimize hemostasis. Later analysis of the study results revealed unexpectedly high potency rates in those men. This observation raised the question, if ARISTA™ AH may have the potential to stabilize the cavernous nerves and thus ameliorate postoperative potency rates. As the previous study by Chedid et al was originally not designed for this endpoint and did not have a control group, we are planning to evaluate this question as a meaningful exploratory co-primary endpoint in the same study cohort.
Conditions
- Prostate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma)
- Blood Loss, Postoperative
- Erectile Function
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Arm A - Application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH
Perioperative application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH to the prostate bed and neurovascular bundles during and at the end of the surgery to control bleeding and oozing in accordance with labelled directions; no other hemostyptic agent in aforementioned area
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Becton, Dickinson and Company
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University of Leipzig
collaborator OTHER -
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
collaborator OTHER -
St. Antonius Hospital Gronau
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, PD · Klinik für Urologie, Urologische Onkologie und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 68 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-16
- Primary Completion
- 2026-01-30
- Completion
- 2027-01-30
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluating Return to Continence and Potency Following Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05742334 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Vesicopexy in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT04981834 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03682146 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retzius-sparing Technique in Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05224024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Technique on Short-term Continence Recovery
NCT02352103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
RCT-evaluation of Retzius-sparing Robotic Prostatectomy
NCT03787823 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Augmented Reality During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT06059859 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Immediate Urinary Continence Predictors After RS-RARP
NCT06850116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Posterior Extra-fascial RARP in Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT06434649 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effects of Frozen Section Technology on Oncological and Functional Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy.
NCT03317990 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Integrated Posterior-Anterior-Lateral Approach and the Posterior Approach in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT07305142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.
NCT07348367 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Anterograde Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Retrograde Technique
NCT02687308 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy With "Sandwich" Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Surgery: A Comparative Prospective Study of 300 Patients
NCT06730243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach
NCT06020287 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
NCT03528057 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Intraoperative ICG on Functional Outc in RARP
NCT06446648 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Comparison of Convective Water Vapor Ablation (Convective Water Vapor Energy, WAVE™) With the Rezum™ System Versus Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) Versus Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TUR-P) in Patients With Benign Prostatic Syndrome (BPS) - A Randomized Study
NCT07204002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Continence and Potency Following Multi-Layer Perinatal Issue alloGraft
NCT05081232 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Prostatectomy Artificial Intelligence Low Pressure Pain (RALP) Trial
NCT06915909 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial of Approaches to Prostate Cancer Surgery
NCT05155501 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Early Complications of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed as an Outpatient Versus an Inpatient Procedure.
NCT06822452 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microspheres in Preventing Lymphatic Fluid Collection After Surgery in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT01644136 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study
NCT00928850 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Treatment
NCT04011865 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA