MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the Integrated Posterior-Anterior-Lateral Approach and the Posterior Approach in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

NCT07305142 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-12-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare perioperative, pathological, and early functional outcomes of PAL （Posterior, Anterior and Lateral）combined approach RARP and posterior approach (with Retzius space preserved) RARP in the treatment of prostate cancer.The main question it aims to answer was:

What is the early therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the combined posterior, anterior, and lateral (PAL) approach, and how does it compare with the traditional posterior approach? Participants were randomly assigned to undergo either robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the PAL (posterior-anterior-lateral) approach or the classic posterior approach.

Conditions

  • Urologic Cancer
  • Prostate
  • Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PAL combined approach group

PAL combined approach was performed to resect the prostate

PROCEDURE

posterior approach group

Intraoperative resection of the prostate was performed by posterior approach

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-05-16
Primary Completion
2025-12-01
Completion
2025-12-02

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07305142 on ClinicalTrials.gov