Clinical Trial of Approaches to Prostate Cancer Surgery

NCT05155501 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 600

Last updated 2026-04-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare cancer control and health-related quality of life following pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy versus standard radical prostatectomy.

The investigators hypothesize that pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy will have similar cancer control (primary outcome) and sexual function outcomes; and significantly better urinary function, penile shortening/deformity and inguinal hernia risks as compared to radical prostatectomy.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP)

The conventional approach to prostate cancer surgery

PROCEDURE

Pelvic fascia-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PFS-RP)

A novel, posterior approach to radical prostatectomy that preserves the dorsal vascular complex, nerves and fascial support structures that overlie the anterior prostate.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    collaborator NIH
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    collaborator NIH
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jim C Hu, MD, MPH · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-05-15
Primary Completion
2028-07-31
Completion
2028-07-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05155501 on ClinicalTrials.gov