Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility Study
NCT00928850 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 154
Last updated 2019-11-21
Summary
This study aims to determine whether surgeons at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center are able to randomize patients to test modifications of surgery to remove the prostate. Surgery to remove the prostate is known as a "radical prostatectomy". Surgeons know many things about the best way to do a radical prostatectomy. However, there is disagreement about some aspects of surgery. Two modifications of surgery to remove the prostate (radical prostatectomy) identified for this study include Irrigation, and Fascial Suturing.
Two aspects of the operation may vary, fascial suturing and urethral irrigation. For each aspect, surgeons will use their clinical judgment as to the best interests of the patient. In other words, if there are clear reasons to use or avoid a fascial suturing approach, the surgeon will act accordingly; similarly, if there is a clear reason to irrigate or avoid irrigating the urethra, the surgeon can make the appropriate clinical decision. If the surgeon is unsure as to which approach to take, then the randomization scheme will be followed.
All of the surgeons who are taking part in this study have used these techniques at different times. However, they are unsure as to the best approach. Sometimes, they use different treatments with different patients.
Irrigation. Cancer cells can spill during surgery and this can cause cancer to return ("recur"). Some surgeons believe that "irrigating" could help stop spilling of cancer cells. "Irrigating" means washing the surgical area with sterile water and sucking the water back up through a tube. As a result, surgeons vary as to how they irrigate. In this study, we will examine irrigation of the urethra. This is the part of the body that carries urine from the bladder to the penis.
Fascial suturing. Surgeons believe that what happens to the urethra can affect the risk of incontinence. This is when a patient cannot control urine, and drips or leaks urine. One idea is that additional stitches ("sutures") to the connective tissue ("fascia") could be helpful, but this is not known for sure.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
radical prostatectomy with urethral irrigation but no fascial suturing, QOL forms
Cancer cells can spill during surgery and this can cause cancer to return ("recur"). Some surgeons believe that "irrigating" could help stop spilling of cancer cells. "Irrigating" means washing the surgical area with sterile water and sucking the water back up through a tube. As a result, surgeons vary as to how they irrigate. In this study, we will examine irrigation of the urethra. This is the part of the body that carries urine from the bladder to the penis. Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
- PROCEDURE
-
radical prostatectomy with fascial suturing but no urethral irrigation, QOL forms
Surgeons believe that what happens to the urethra can affect the risk of incontinence. This is when a patient cannot control urine, and drips or leaks urine. One idea is that additional stitches ("sutures") to the connective tissue ("fascia") could be helpful, but this is not known for sure. Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
- PROCEDURE
-
radical prostatectomy with both urethral irrigation and fascial suturing, QOL forms
Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
- PROCEDURE
-
radical prostatectomy with neither urethral irrigation nor fascial suturing, QOL forms
Quality of life are assessed for clinical evaluation approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Andrew Vickers, MD · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2018-05-04
- Completion
- 2018-05-04
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Radical Prostatectomy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
NCT00027794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Vesicopexy in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT04981834 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy
NCT01325506 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Partial Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
NCT06624813 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retzius-sparing Technique in Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05224024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Athermal Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02079155 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Radical Prostatectomy Versus Curative Radiotherapy for Treatment of Organ Confined Prostate Cancer (Retrospective Comparative Study)
NCT07205783 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial of Seminal Vesicle-Sparing Prostatectomy and Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT01825642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Robotic Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT00292019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Improved Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Bladder Suspension and Preliminary Outcomes
NCT06977906 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Day-surgery Management for Patients Undergoing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: a Randomized Trial
NCT06891664 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Immediate Urinary Continence Predictors After RS-RARP
NCT06850116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
The Effects of Method of Anaesthesia on the Safety and Effectiveness of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
NCT05566405 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01365143 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Open Anterograde Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Retrograde Technique
NCT02687308 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Early Complications of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed as an Outpatient Versus an Inpatient Procedure.
NCT06822452 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Limited Versus Extended Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
NCT07308990 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Archive Prostate. Observational Study of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy Surgery
NCT06154499 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
A Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Precision Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancers.
NCT07348367 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach
NCT06020287 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ejaculatory Behavior and Seminal Vesicle Size During Radical Prostatectomy
NCT07243795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With or Without Pelvic Drain Placement in Reducing Adverse Events After Surgery in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT01613651 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation in Ablation of Prostate Cancer in Humans
NCT01790451 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Effects of Urinary Bladder Hypertrophy on Urge Urine Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03061760 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy - Surgical and Anesthetic Considerations
NCT01955863 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA