MedTrace Logo

Simplified vs Conventional Drilling Protocol for Implant Placment

NCT06780956 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46

Last updated 2025-01-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Despite the growing interest in these alternative drilling protocols, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence evaluating their long-term effects on MBL. The aim of the present study was therefore, to evaluate the effect of implant site preparation technique (conventional drilling versus simplfied) on change in the marginal bone level and insertion torque.

Conditions

  • MBL
  • Bone Loss

Interventions

OTHER

Conventional

conventional drilling protocol using full sequence

OTHER

simplfied

3 burrs for implant placment

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-12-01
Primary Completion
2023-07-01
Completion
2024-03-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06780956 on ClinicalTrials.gov