Evaluation of Implant Stability Changes in Sites Prepared with Different Osseodensification Techniques: a Prospective Observational Clinical Study
NCT06679894 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 12
Last updated 2024-11-08
Summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare, within a cohort of patients requiring rehabilitation in two different sites of the premolar area in the upper maxilla, the primary and secondary stability of implants placed in sites prepared using a magnetic mallet and osseodensification burs.
Conditions
- Edentulous
- Alveolar Process Atrophy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Implant site preparation with osteotomes and electrified mallet
Under local anesthesia (mepivacaine HCL 2% with epinephrine1:100.000), a minimally invasive full-thickness flap was elevated to expose the alveolar crest. A pilot osteotome (100-P) was used to easily perforate the cortical plate. Subsequently, osteotomes with gradually increasing diameters were employed until the final diameter of 3.2 mm was reached. The sequence of osteotomes and their respective diameters were as follows: 1. Osteotome 100-P: At a height of 8.5 mm, the diameter was 2.2 mm; 2. Osteotome 160: At a height of 8.5 mm, the diameter was 2.8 mm; 3. Osteotome 200: At a height of 8.5 mm, the diameter was 3.2 mm. Implant (4.0x8.5 mm; Anyridge, Megagen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea) was positioned using a surgical motor. A 3 mm high transepithelial abutment (OCTA, Megagen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea) was connected to it using a torque wrench and it was tightened to 30 Ncm. Single sutures in monofilament synthetic polypropylene 4.0 were performed to close flaps around the abutment.
- PROCEDURE
-
Implant site preparation with osseodensification drills
Under local anesthesia (mepivacaine HCL 2% with epinephrine1:100.000), a minimally invasive full-thickness flap was elevated to expose the alveolar crest. The implant site preparation was realized using osseodensification burs at a rotation speed of 1200 rpm. The osseodensification burs sequence was as follows: 1. Initial pilot hole (rotated clockwise); 2. WT1828 bur (rotated counterclockwise), 3. WT2838 bur (rotated counterclockwise). Implant (4.0x8.5 mm; Anyridge, Megagen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea) was positioned using a surgical motor. A 3 mm high transepithelial abutment (OCTA, Megagen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea) was connected to it using a torque wrench and it was tightened to 30 Ncm. Single sutures in monofilament synthetic polypropylene 4.0 were performed to close flaps around the abutment.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Trieste
collaborator OTHER -
International Piezosurgery Academy
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-02-15
- Primary Completion
- 2024-07-15
- Completion
- 2024-11-05
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Trans-gingival or Subcrestal Short Implants Posterior Maxilla Bone Changes
NCT05975138 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Analysising the Marginal Bone Loss, Torque and Implant Stability Placed in Bone and Tissue Level Dental Implants
NCT07288606 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Width and Abutment Height Influence Peri-implant Bone Resorption
NCT03229005 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Thickness of the Peri-implant Soft Tissue on Marginal Bone Remodeling
NCT03077880 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Longitudinal Clinical Study for the Evaluation of Peri-implant Tissue and Osseointegration After Rehabilitation With Osseointegrated Implants
NCT06967649 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Implant Insertion Torque on Post-Surgical Marginal Bone Stability
NCT07019480 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implant Stability in Healed Maxillary Posterior Sites Comparing Osteotome, Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling Implant Placement Techniques
NCT06599112 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Dimensional Changes at Different Implant-to-abutment Connections: a 1-year Clinical and Radiological Study
NCT01807416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Implant Insertion Torque and Primary Stability
NCT03222219 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Using Different Screwed Abutment Height
NCT06017115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short vs Standard Implants in Maxilla
NCT03479333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ten Year Follow up of Convergent Profile Implants
NCT07089407 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Thread Designs on Primary Stability of Dental Implant Using Osseodensification Technique in Posterior Maxilla : Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07242716 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short Implants in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla
NCT06759246 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Stability Using Densah Bur Versus Expander
NCT03613415 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survival Rate of 2 Implant-supported Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06447792 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla
NCT04442763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Manual or Digitally Guided Surgical Technique for Replacing Single Tooth Edentulism by Means of Sub-crestally Placed Implants. A 3-year Parallel Randomized Clinical Study on Marginal Bone Levels Stability
NCT06250621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Success and Survival Rate of Tranmucosal Versus Bone Level Implants: Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06252324 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
CD vs IOD Opposing Mandibular IOD : Bone Height Changes of the Premaxilla
NCT06752642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Triple-blinded Non-inferiority Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Hybrid and Fully Etched Implants P1
NCT06100120 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Abutment Dis-/Reconnection and Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss.
NCT02617212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Full-Arch Rehabilitation
NCT01905306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Evaluation of Different Abutment Materials for OsseoSpeed Implants
NCT02090647 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA