MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the Effects of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, Graston Technique and Percussive Therapy

NCT06634862 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-10-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intermittent pneumatic pressure, percussive therapy and graston after a fatigue protocol applied to the leg muscles.

Conditions

  • Recovery Method

Interventions

OTHER

Normatec Air Compression

Intermittent pneumatic pressure has been used in other studies, usually for deep vein thrombosis and vascular disorders. In this way, it has not been compared with other recovery interventions for post-exercise recovery applications.

OTHER

Soft Tissue Mobilization

The soft tissue mobilisation technique has been investigated in other studies in terms of its effect on soft tissue and its role recovery. In this way, there is no comparison with other recovery interventions for post-exercise recovery applications.

OTHER

Percussive therapy

Percussive therapy has been investigated in device research and athlete health. In this way, it has not been compared with other recovery interventions for post-exercise recovery applications.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Okan University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-12-02
Primary Completion
2025-03-16
Completion
2025-05-18

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06634862 on ClinicalTrials.gov