MedTrace Logo

Open Versus Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty Among Adult Patients With Primary Pelvi-Ureteric Junction Obstruction

NCT06572371 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34

Last updated 2024-08-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To prospectively compare the perioperative, morphological and functional outcomes on short and medium term between laparoscopic (LP) and open pyeloplasty (OP) patients.

Conditions

  • Open
  • Laparoscopic
  • Dismembered Pyeloplasty
  • Primary Pelvi-Ureteric Junction
  • Obstruction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty

The first trocar was inserted under vision through the same supraumbilical incision and the intraperitoneal cavity was inspected The second 5 mm trocar was placed in the midclavicular line 2 inches below the costal margin. The third 10 mm trocar was placed lateral to the rectus muscle at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine. In right-sided pyeloplasty, a fourth trocar was inserted below the xiphistemum for liver retraction. Incision of the line of Toldt and mobilization of the colon was the first step of the transperitoneal approach. A 4/0 polysorbe stay suture was taken in the lateral aspect of the ureter distal to uretero-pelvic junction obstruction to identify the correct orientation after dismembering the ureter. A full thickness anastomosis was started from the angle of V shape spatulation to the lower pole of the renal pelvis.

PROCEDURE

Open pyeloplasty

A flank incision with the patient in lateral position was undertaken in open pyeloplasty. After accessing the retro- peritoneum, the ureter was identified and traced cranially till the PUJ segment. Traction sutures was placed on the renal pelvis followed by excision of the narrowing segment. The ureter was spatulated by approximately 2 cm and a reduction pyeloplasty was performed, where necessary. Anastomosis was undertaken using vicryl 4-0 sutures. The primary anastomotic site was sutured in interrupted fashion followed by a continuous running suture of the posterior wall. Next, antegrade DJ stenting was performed and the anterior wall was anastomosed. After haemostatic control a 22 Fr drain was placed in the surgical bed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tanta University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-10-01
Primary Completion
2023-10-01
Completion
2023-10-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06572371 on ClinicalTrials.gov