Prospective Versus Retrospective Complications in Radical Cystectomy and Nephrectomy

NCT03052504 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 156

Last updated 2018-06-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study will examine which differences there are in comorbidity and complications collected retrospectively from medical records compared with data collected prospectively in two groups of patients undergoing either radical cystectomy or radical nephrectomy.

Hypothesis is that he prevalence of registered comorbidity and minor complications in patients who have undergone radical cystectomy or nephrectomy, will increase if the data collection is focused and prospective, compared with retrospectively collected data.

The study will be conducted as a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Patients included in the study will be randomized to either control or intervention in the ratio 1:1. There are two groups of patients: Patients admitted to radical cystectomy and patients admitted to radical nephrectomy, due to cancer.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Registration of complications

Prospective registration

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-09-30
Primary Completion
2018-02-28
Completion
2018-02-28

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03052504 on ClinicalTrials.gov