Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation (BipolEP) vs Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

NCT03503721 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84

Last updated 2018-04-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare two different surgical methods for treating benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

The investigators are going to compare the risks and benefits of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP). Furthermore, the investigators are going to compare the amount of tissue resected per minute, in order to assess the efficiency of each surgical method.

It is a prospective, interventional, multi-centre (2 centres total), randomized trial.

Approximately 84 patients will be included

Conditions

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

BipolEP

the prostate will be transurethrally enucleated using a bipolar current

PROCEDURE

bipolarTURP

the prostate will transurethrally resected using a bipolar current

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Salzburger Landeskliniken

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Thomas Kunit, MD · Vice Chairman

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-18
Primary Completion
2021-01-18
Completion
2021-06-18

Countries

  • Austria
  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03503721 on ClinicalTrials.gov