MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Different Ways for Using Lidocaine During FB

NCT06563050 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240

Last updated 2024-08-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized lidocaine, oropharyngeal lidocaine spray, or their combination for better outcome of topical anesthesia in subjects undergoing diagnostic FB; severity of cough , pain during procedure , cumulative dose of anesthesia needed and its adverse reaction , overall satisfaction .

Conditions

  • Lidocaine Spray
  • Nebulized Lidocaine
  • Lung Diseases
  • Lung Cancer

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Nebulized lidocaine

Subjects in group A underwent nebulization with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine for 15 minutes by using a jet nebulizer.

PROCEDURE

Lidocaine spray

Subjects in group B will underwent 10% lidocaine spray solution will be sprayed 10 times at the oropharynx at 5 s interval.

PROCEDURE

Combination of nebulized lidocaine and lidocaine spray

Group C: both nebulization and spray will be performed in the same manner except the number of spray will be 2 instead 10.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohamed Mostafa Abdelhadi · Professor of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis

  • Montaser Gamal Ahmed · lecturer of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis

  • Nermeen Mohammed Abuelkassem · lecturer of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-09-30
Primary Completion
2026-09-30
Completion
2026-11-30

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06563050 on ClinicalTrials.gov