MedTrace Logo

Immediate vs Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement

NCT06526351 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2024-07-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this study is to assess clinical, radiological and patient centred outcomes of immediate and conventional implant loading protocols, and to compare clinical outcomes of these two different loading protocols (immediate and conventional) in combination with early implant placement of single implants in the esthetic zone of maxilla.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant

Interventions

DEVICE

Early implant placement with immediate provisional restoration

Implants placed following early implant placement protocol with soft tissue healing (6-8 weeks after tooth extraction). GBR procedure performed together with implant placement. Immediate provisional restoration will be delivered.

DEVICE

Early implant placement with delayed loading

Implants placed following early implant placement protocol with soft tissue healing (6-8 weeks after tooth extraction). GBR procedure performed together with implant placement. Delayed loading protocol followed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland

    collaborator OTHER

  • University of Belgrade

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Aleksa Markovic, Professor · Chair of Implant Center, School of Dental Medicine

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-03-29
Primary Completion
2027-03-31
Completion
2027-03-31

Countries

  • Serbia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06526351 on ClinicalTrials.gov