MedTrace Logo

Immediate Versus Conventional Loading of Early Placed Dental Implant Supporting Single Crowns

NCT06693297 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2024-11-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study focuses on examining the efficacy and clinical performance of immediate loading of early placed single implants.

The aim of the randomized controlled trial is to compare between two loading protocols (immediate versus conventional) of early placed implants (Type 2-3A) in terms of clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Null hypothesis: There will be no significant differences in implant survival/success, stability, radiographic marginal bone level, and patient reported outcomes between immediately or conventionally loaded and early placed implants.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant

Interventions

DEVICE

Immediate loading of early placed implants

Implants with active thread design will be used. The implants placed will be randomly allocated into either immediate loading or conventional loading group.

DEVICE

Conventional loading of early placed implants

Definitive loading of early placed implants upon successful osteointegration (after 8 weks)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Straumann Group

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • MegaGen

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • University of Jordan

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-09-25
Primary Completion
2025-09-30
Completion
2026-09-30

Countries

  • Jordan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06693297 on ClinicalTrials.gov