Weight-bearing of Patients After Pelvic Ring Fracture
NCT06481865 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2024-07-01
Summary
Pelvic ring fractures are fractures associated with high morbidity and mortality. When the fracture is displaced, surgical management to achieve reduction and fixation of the anterior and posterior annulus is the current reference. The optimal technique that gives the best results is controversial. Open reductions and internal fixations (ORIFs) are associated with more blood loss and a higher rate of infection, while closed reductions and percutaneous fixations (CRPF) are associated with more screw misplacements and thus vascular or nerve damage. The results appear to be similar in the literature between the two approaches
Surgery for pelvic ring fractures has become increasingly common over the past three decades Recovery is often delayed for weeks post-surgery, depending on the center. Modern management emphasizes early rehabilitation, including early mobility and weight-bearing, when possible. Increasing the number of screws, their diameter and length, and systematically fixing both anterior and posterior lesions add safety for early reloading
The aim of the study is The main objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical outcome associated with early weight-bearing in patients operated on for a pelvic ring fracture in a large cohort of patients at Grenoble University Hospital, compared to patients operated on for the same type of pelvic ring fracture with delayed weight-bearing.
The investigator hypothesize that early weight-bearing of pelvic ring fractures with biomechanically stable fixation does not result in significant differences in clinical outcomes at a minimum of one year compared to patients with delayed weight-bearing
Conditions
- Weight-bearing of Patients After Pelvic Ring Fracture
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Grenoble
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mehdi PI BOUDISSA · Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-01
- Completion
- 2025-06-01
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Snapshot Audit of Traumatic Pelvic Ring Injuries
NCT06540339 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Surgery of the Pilon Fractures
NCT03367169 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Associated Abdominal Injuries on Clinical and Operative Outcome in Pelvic Injuries
NCT03952026 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of a Clinical Pathway for Pelvic Fragility Fractures
NCT06054165 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Geriatric Lateral Compression 1 Pelvic Fractures
NCT05765669 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures in the Elderly
NCT02590783 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study
NCT04615104 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Weight Bearing After Pelvis and Acetabulum Fracture Fixation
NCT07189156 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of Pelvis in Fragility Fracture in Germany: a Prospective, National, Multicenter, Observational, Comparative Cohort Study Comparing Isolated Posterior Versus Combined Anterior-posterior Surgical Fracture Stabilization
NCT06550934 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Surgical Treatment of Low Energy Pelvic Fractures in the Elderly
NCT02591043 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Effectiveness of a Polymer Cerclage System Compared to Cerclages Used in Standard Care (CERCPMCF) )
NCT05087667 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rim Plate to Buttress Plate for Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures With and Without Inter-fragmentary Screws
NCT06409559 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures
NCT06755580 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combined Ring (APR) Fixation Vs Posterior Ring Fixation in Tile B2 and C1 Pelvic Ring Injuries
NCT05042297 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Immediate Weight Bearing Versus Protected Weight Bearing in Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures
NCT03167099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Binder vs. Pelvic C-clamp for Bleeding Control
NCT04410952 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Postoperative Score Predictive of the Prognosis of Acetabular Fractures
NCT04626388 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Trans-sacral Screw Versus Two Iliosacral Screws
NCT03944174 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Single vs Double Symphyseal Plating in Management of Vertically Unstable Open Book Pelvic Ring Injuries:
NCT06439108 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Augmented Fixation Techniques in Fragility Fracture Pelvis (FFP)
NCT05837182 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Two- Part Proximal Humerus - Conservative vs Operative
NCT04106674 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Factors for Failure of Internal Fixations of Lower Limb Fractures
NCT03091114 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Role of Intraoperative Navigation-assisted Channel Screw Technique in the Treatment of Pelvic Fractures
NCT05448911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pilot Study Comparing Two Techniques of Taking Care Analgesic in Patients 70 and Older, Awaiting Surgery After Extracapsular Fracture of the Proximal Femur
NCT03185663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study
NCT03032653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA