Combined Ring (APR) Fixation Vs Posterior Ring Fixation in Tile B2 and C1 Pelvic Ring Injuries
NCT05042297 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2021-09-13
Summary
The aim for surgical treatment of unstable Tile B2 \& C1 pelvic ring injuries is an anatomical reduction to allow early weight-bearing, pain relief and to prevent future pelvic asymmetry. So, we usually used combined posterior \& anterior ring fixation, relying on the fact that anterior pelvic ring adequate reduction and fixation better augment posterior ring fixation and enhance overall pelvic stability. However, anterior ring fixation requires a second incision with a longer operation time and more blood loss. The main disadvantage of the second incision is the higher risk of wound infection, either superficial or deep, which questions its necessity and raises concerns about the possibility of isolated posterior ring fixation in managing Tile B2 \& C1 pelvic ring injuries with good outcomes.
The fundamental algorithm was the questionable need for additional anterior ring fixation in managing Tile B2 and C1 pelvic ring injuries combined with posterior ring fixation, whether the incidence of postoperative complications, radiological and clinical outcomes differed between these two groups. After reviewing the literature, we found a lack of knowledge in the prospective assessment of such outcomes between the two fixation groups. So, This RCT aims to reach a satisfactory result and prove or deny the questionable need for anterior ring fixation in managing Tile B2 and C1 pelvic ring injuries. Our hypothesis was that PR fixation is at least as good as APR fixation.
Conditions
- Evaluation of PR Fixation in Tile B2 and C1 Injuries
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Combined posterior and anterior ring fixation: Active comparator. Isolated posterior ring fixation: Experimental intervention
Reduction of the posterior ring was either closed reduction in SI joint dislocations \& fracture-dislocations and sacral fractures or open reduction in iliac wing fractures through the lateral window of the ilioinguinal approach. Anterior pelvic ring reduction and fixation in the combined APR fixation group was done via the classic Pfannenstiel approach or extension more lateral \& completing the anterior intrapelvic approach. Fixation was via pubic rami plating.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Amr K. Mahmoud, Professor · no funding recieved
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-03-09
- Primary Completion
- 2020-07-07
- Completion
- 2021-07-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Platelet-rich Plasma Combined With Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Atrophic Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fractures
NCT03129971 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures in the Elderly
NCT02590783 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Subcutaneous INFIX and EXFIX for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures Requiring Stabilization
NCT02403154 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Binder vs. Pelvic C-clamp for Bleeding Control
NCT04410952 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Fixation of Sacral Fractures by Posterior Plate
NCT03605797 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Role of Intraoperative Navigation-assisted Channel Screw Technique in the Treatment of Pelvic Fractures
NCT05448911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Rim Plate to Buttress Plate for Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures With and Without Inter-fragmentary Screws
NCT06409559 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvis RCT: Impact of Surgery on Pain in Lateral Compression Type Pelvic Fractures
NCT02625766 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Trans-sacral Screw Versus Two Iliosacral Screws
NCT03944174 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Two-stage ORIF Vs Ex. Fix. in Complex Pilon Fractures
NCT05141227 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Morphological Characteristics of Inferior Pole Patellar Fractures and a Finite Element Analysis Combined with a Retrospective Clinical Study of Anchor Suture and Titanium Cable Cerclage Treatment
NCT06736639 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
W-Shaped Acetabular Angular Plate (WAAP) Versus Reconstruction Plate
NCT02327949 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Buried Intramedullary K-wire Fixation Compared With Plate and Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures in Unstable Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fractures
NCT02718170 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Curative Effect Between New Tension Band and Patellar Tension Reduction Band in the Treatment of Lower Pole Fractures of Patella
NCT04960501 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Weight-bearing of Patients After Pelvic Ring Fracture
NCT06481865 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Weight Bearing After Pelvis and Acetabulum Fracture Fixation
NCT07189156 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fibular Fixation in Ankle Fractures:Plate Verses Nail.
NCT02507193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polyurethane Foam on the Sacrum for Prevention
NCT02692482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Study for Unstable Sacrum/Pelvis and Acetabular Fracture Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation
NCT05683314 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Early Internal Fixation Versus NonOperative Care With Early Rehabilitation for LC1 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis
NCT06496867 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Augmented Fixation Techniques in Fragility Fracture Pelvis (FFP)
NCT05837182 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Platelet Rich Plasma Injection in Pilon Fractures
NCT02481869 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Knee Dislocation - Clinical Evaluation of the Use of Hinged External Fixator After Ligament Reconstruction
NCT02290197 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Complex Pilon Fractures
NCT06089525 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
High-Strength Suture vs. Traditional Tension Band for Patellar Fractures
NCT07248982 ·Status: RECRUITING