MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Sacral Fractures

NCT06755580 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 51

Last updated 2025-02-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate patients with vertically unstable high-energy sacral fracture operated on at our institution with spinopelvic fixation, to compare the traditionally open method of fixation with the minimally invasive fixation. The aim of the research is to determine whether minimally invasive surgical techniques can achieve comparable fracture reduction and functional outcome as open surgical approaches. Another aim is to determine whether the minimally invasive surgical procedure leads to shorter patient hospitalization, lower perioperative blood loss, and lower postoperative complications.

Conditions

  • Sacral Fracture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

spinopelvic fixation

open and minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation for unstable or dislocated high-energy sacral fractures

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Tomas Hrin, MD · F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
77 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-01
Primary Completion
2024-12-16
Completion
2024-12-18

Countries

  • Slovakia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06755580 on ClinicalTrials.gov