Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on the Implant Stability Implant Stability
NCT06334770 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 18
Last updated 2024-03-28
Summary
Fourteen completely edentulous patients were selected to participate in this study. From the outpatient clinic of Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University.
After fabrication of complete denture for all patients, patients were randomly divided to:
Group A: Seven patients were rehabilitated with implant retained maxillary overdenture where four Straumann BLX® implant were inserted opposed by mandibular complete denture.
Group B: Seven patients were rehabilitated with implant retained maxillary overdenture where four conventional acid etched implants were inserted opposed by mandibular complete denture.
After implant placement using surgical guide, smart peg and ostell device were used to measure the primary stability of the implant then cover screw was placed and after six weeks, secondary stability was measured for both groups.
After four months, the second stage started in which exposure of the implant fixtures took place and pick up was carried out.
Patients were recalled frequently for post-insertion inspection and adjustment.
Conditions
- Completely Edentulous Patients
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Roxolid implants
four Straumann BLX® roxolid implant 15% zirconium and 85% titanium), 3.7 mm in diameter, and 10 mm in length.implants were selected with the following criteria: tapered, self-tapping, aggressively threaded,were inserted with novalock attachments.
- DEVICE
-
Titanium implants
four conventional acid etched pure implants tapered, self-tapping, threaded, two-piece, with the 10 mm length and 3.7 mm diameter were inserted with Sphero flex attachments.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
shaimaa L mohamed, PROFESSOR · Ains hams univeristy
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 45 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2022-01-22
- Completion
- 2023-12-12
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Marginal Bone Loss for Immediately Loaded Implants in Maxillary Full Arch Interim Prosthesis Using Welded Titanium Bar Versus Polyetheretherketone Bar
NCT06127017 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Effect of Topical Application of Hyaluronic Acid on Immediate Dental Implant
NCT03691467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A 36-month Analysis of the Clinical Performance of Individualized CAD/CAM-produced Dental Implants: a Cohort Study
NCT06576284 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Surface Topography and Color Stability of Implant Supported 3D Printed Provisional Restorations
NCT06947070 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Implants With Different Implant Surfaces.
NCT07087717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05972538 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant-fixed Restorations With ANKYLOS 6.6 mm Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla - A 5-year Follow-up Study
NCT02656823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short Implants in Edentulous Mandible
NCT04838184 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Effect of Clip Material on the Retention of Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06866067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Survival Rate of 2 Implant-supported Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06447792 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Maxillary Overdenture Implants
NCT06038487 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal and Palatal Bone Thickness and Marginal Bone Changes Implants
NCT05632172 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Assessment of Customized 3D Zirconium Versus Titanium Mesh for Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Delayed Implant Placement
NCT06933030 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading of 4 Guided Implants Supporting a Maxillary Overdenture Using a Novaloc TiN Retention System
NCT06083506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Removable Prosthesis Retained by 4 Implant-supported Locator-Attachments
NCT02380404 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Related Factors Influencing the Stability of Dental Implants
NCT02733861 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Success Rate of Immediately Loaded Implants With Platform Switched Design Placed in Anterior Part of Mandible and Restored With Fixed Prostheses
NCT00780273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Immediate Implant in Posterior Mandible Region
NCT07027904 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Implant Position on Clinical Outcomes
NCT06166316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement
NCT04029324 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06643975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement Using Xenograft Mixed with Vitamin D Versus Hyaluronic Acid.
NCT06842368 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Implants and Locators for Improved Retention
NCT02551146 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Straumann Roxolid Multi-Center Study
NCT01842958 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Versus Inclined Implant to Retain Locator Maxillary Overdenture
NCT05843331 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA