MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Implants With Different Implant Surfaces.

NCT07087717 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2025-07-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study looks at how the surface texture of dental implants affects the surrounding bone and the overall gum health over time. It compares two types of implant surfaces: one partially smooth and one slightly rough. The researchers also check how these implant treatments impact patients' quality of life related to oral health after 1 year and again after 8 years.

Conditions

  • Oral Health Quality of Life (OHQoL) Was Assessed
  • the Effect of Surface Roughness on Crestal Bone Remodelling
  • The Effect of Surface Roughness on Peri-implant Health

Interventions

DEVICE

Split-Mouth Placement of an implant with a moderately rough surface (DCC).

Surgical placement of a dental implant in canine area (left or right, assigned by flipping a coin) of the mandibular bone of the patient.

DEVICE

Split-Mouth Placement of an implant with a hybrid surface (MSC).

Surgical placement of a dental implant in canine area (left or right, assigned by flipping a coin) of the mandibular bone of the patient.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Ghent

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Maarten Glibert, DDS, MSc, PhD · University Ghent

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-12
Primary Completion
2024-12-12
Completion
2024-12-12

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07087717 on ClinicalTrials.gov