Class III Malocclusion and ALT-RAMEC
NCT05913076 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2023-06-22
Summary
Diverse viewpoints exist regarding the correlation between the conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and facemask approach and the alternative RME and facemask hybrid technique (Alt-RAMEC) in terms of the degree of maxillary protraction. The findings of the study may offer a novel approach to protocol selection based on the anomaly's degree of severity. The objective of this investigation is to assess and contrast the skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes of three distinct Alt-RAMEC techniques.
Conditions
- Face Mask
- Rapid Maxillary Expansion
- Maxillary Retrognathism
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Delaire Face Mask (M0774-01, Leone S.p.A., Florence, Italy) for first group
The study involved the fabrication of occlusal-coverage bonded type RME devices utilizing Hyrax screws (A0620-11, Leone S.p.A., Firenze, Italy). Each patient in Group 1 (classical RME method) was instructed to open Hyrax screw twice a day for a week. At the end of the respective periods (1 week), the screws were fixed with ligatures, and the patients were evaluated. Face-mask treatment was subsequently started after RME. Totaling 700 g of extraoral traction force applied to maxilla. Patients were advised to wear Delaire type facemasks (M0774-00, Leone SpA) 14-16 hours a day for 6 months.
- DEVICE
-
Delaire Face Mask (M0774-01, Leone S.p.A., Florence, Italy) for second group
The same fabrication of occlusal-coverage bonded type RME devices were utilized Hyrax screws (A0620-11, Leone S.p.A., Firenze, Italy) in Group 2. Each patient in Group 2 (3-week Alt-RAMEC protocol), the patients were instructed to activate Hyrax screw twice a day for one week, close the screw for following week, and open the screw over the third week. At the end of the respective periods (3 weeks), the screws were fixed with ligatures, and the patients were evaluated. Face-mask treatment was subsequently started after RME. Totaling 700 g of extraoral traction force applied to maxilla. Patients were advised to wear Delaire type facemasks (M0774-00, Leone SpA) 14-16 hours a day for 6 months.
- DEVICE
-
Delaire Face Mask (M0774-01, Leone S.p.A., Florence, Italy) for third group
The same fabrication of occlusal-coverage bonded type RME devices were utilized Hyrax screws (A0620-11, Leone S.p.A., Firenze, Italy) in Group 3. Each patient in Group 3 (5-week Alt-RAMEC protocol), the patients were instructed to activate Hyrax screw twice a day for one week, close the screw for following week, and open the screw over the third week. The aforementioned screw open-close procedure was implemented over a period of five weeks. At the end of the respective periods (5 weeks), the screws were fixed with ligatures, and the patients were evaluated. Face-mask treatment was subsequently started after RME. Totaling 700 g of extraoral traction force applied to maxilla. Patients were advised to wear Delaire type facemasks (M0774-00, Leone SpA) 14-16 hours a day for 6 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Istanbul University
collaborator OTHER -
Trakya University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nilüfer Yılmaz Öğütlü, Dr. · Istanbul University
-
Gülsün Külekçi Çakan · Private Practitioner
-
Hülya Kılıçoğlu, Prof. Dr. · Istanbul University
-
Hande Uzunçıbuk, Dr. · Trakya University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- SEQUENTIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 9 Years
- Max Age
- 11 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-01-13
- Primary Completion
- 2012-07-15
- Completion
- 2012-08-15
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative 3D Assessment of Class III Malocclusion Treatments
NCT07179354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Response After Maxillary Orthopedic Expansion in Class II Growing Subjects
NCT03159962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Customized and Standard Facemasks for Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT06402656 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Orthopedic Face Mask Use on Head Posture and Pharyngeal Airway
NCT05114642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Two 3D Functional Appliances Herbst and Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) on Posterior Airway Space And TMJ in Growing Class II Malocclusion Patients
NCT07094841 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Modified 3D Printed Customized Facemask Appliance for Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT06250127 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Growing Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Maxillary Constriction
NCT06762418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expanders (Conventional, Hybrid and MSE)
NCT05446714 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Bone-anchored Protraction on Maxillary Growth in the Young Child
NCT02711111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
NCT04354116 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Splint Usage in Laterognathic Cl III Orthognathic Surgery Patients
NCT05216874 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three Levels of Force Application for Maxillary Protraction
NCT04310267 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polygraphic Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Sleep Quality
NCT04529213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency
NCT04863404 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effects of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT04604392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance
NCT03172442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoral Device vs Facial Mask for Class III Treatment
NCT04387175 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Maxillary Expansion
NCT05248087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT03976635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Airway by Acoustic Rhinometry
NCT04529057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary and Mandibular Arch Response to RME: a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02798822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances
NCT06366737 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Various Rapid Palatal Expansion Appliances on Dentoskeletal, Dentoalveolar, Nasal and Airway Resistance
NCT06009796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA