Comparison of Two Tooth-borne Expanders in Rapid Maxillary Expansion
NCT03846518 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2020-03-05
Summary
This study will assess the dentoalveolar effects and impact on quality of life of two types of maxillary expanders in orthodontic patients with permanent dentition, from 12 to 16 years old. Half of participants will be treated using the Hyrax expander, while the other half will use the mini Hyrax expander. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between dentoalveolar effects and impact on quality of life of the two protocols.
Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Posterior Crossbite
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Hyrax
Rapid maxillary expansion using the Hyrax expander. Appliance anchorage will be performed by bands adapted to the first maxillary molars and arms of the screw contoured to adapt to palatal faces of the first and second maxillary bicuspids, in wich will be bonded by resin. The screw will be positioned perpendicularly to the palate sagittal midline, between second maxillary bicuspids and first maxillary molars, and 5 mm apically from marginal gingiva of palatal face of the first maxillary molars.The activation protocol will be 2 turns a day up to obtain transverse overcorrection. After the active period of RME, the screws will be fixed with ligature wire and the appliance will be kept as a retainer for 6 months.
- DEVICE
-
mini Hyrax
Rapid maxillary expansion using the mini Hyrax expander. Appliance anchorage will be performed by bands adapted to the first maxillary molars and arms of the screw contoured to adapt to palatal faces of the first and second maxillary bicuspids, in wich will be bonded by resin. The screw will be positioned perpendicularly to the palate sagittal midline, between second maxillary bicuspids and first maxillary molars, and 5 mm apically from marginal gingiva of palatal face of the first maxillary molars. The activation protocol will be 2 turns a day up to obtain transverse overcorrection. After the active period of RME, the screws will be fixed with ligature wire and the appliance will be kept as a retainer for 6 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dauro D Oliveira, PhD · Associate professor and program director of Orthodontics
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Years
- Max Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-09-18
- Completion
- 2020-02-27
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Immediate Skeletal and Dento-alveolar Effects of Two and Four Mini-screw Supported Hyrax for Maxillary Expansion in Non-growing Patients
NCT06851728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expanders (Conventional, Hybrid and MSE)
NCT05446714 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents
NCT04225637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Modified Hyrax Versus Quad Helix in Treatment of Posterior Cross Bite
NCT06300775 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Skeletal and Dental Changes with Hyrax-type Rapid Maxillary Expander Anchored to Permanent Versus Deciduous Molars
NCT05773573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols
NCT03712007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Different Rapid Orthodontic Expansion Devices
NCT03258411 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Effectiveness of Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion in Treating Posterior Crossbite
NCT03667508 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Discomfort During Maxillary Expansion
NCT03757468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Stability of Tooth-borne vs Bone-borne Maxillary Expansion: A Parallel Cohort Study
NCT06916299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between Modified Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expander And Modified Rapid Palatal Expander in Molar Distalization Using Cone- Beam Computed Tomography
NCT07038902 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tow Maxillary Hybrid Expanders Screw Supported Versus Lateral Angulated One; a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
NCT05193513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Versus Laboratory-Fabricated Hyrax Expanders
NCT05743127 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Different Anchorage-supported Appliances and Expansion Procedures for Face Mask Treatment
NCT06244563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyrax Vs. Invisalign Palatal Expander Clinical Study
NCT06662279 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Skeletal and Dental Arch Changes Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment in Children
NCT01765062 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite.
NCT07301918 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Analysis of Palatal Morphology of Growing Patients Treated With Rapid Palatal Expander.
NCT06522607 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Treatment of Unilateral Posterior Cross Bite in Children
NCT04458506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Expander Via Two Approaches of Microosteoperforations
NCT05433038 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Aligners vs ABT and RCOS for Deep Bite Correction: CBCT Study
NCT07096401 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Mini-screw Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion on Midpalatal Suture in Post-pubertal Patients: a CBCT Study
NCT07075211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Anchorage Control Using Arch Wire Stopper Versus Mini-Screws
NCT06416904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
NCT04354116 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion
NCT04760535 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA