Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Lateral Spreading Lesions - A Randomised Controlled Trial

NCT04138030 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 182

Last updated 2025-03-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparing the complete resection rate and subsequent adenoma recurrence rate at surveillance colonoscopy of 15-40mm laterally spreading adenomas for conventional EMR vs. cold snare EMR.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy snare closed over a polyp with electrocautery

PROCEDURE

Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy snare closed over a polyp without electrocautery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Western Sydney Local Health District

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Michael Bourke, MBBS · Western SLHD

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-11-12
Primary Completion
2024-03-05
Completion
2024-03-05

Countries

  • Australia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04138030 on ClinicalTrials.gov